- Number-crunchers put GOP chances of retaking Senate at 60 percent: report
- Ohio sheriff sends bill to Mexico for cost of jailing illegals
- Fla. voters’ support for medical marijuana bodes well for ballot measure: poll
- Keith Urban concert ends in ‘nutso’ chaos, with dozens arrested, injured
- Very religious still lean toward GOP, reflecting long-term patterns, Gallup poll shows
- Fist bump becoming all the rage for germ-wary handshakers
- Tennessee storms ravage counties, wreck 10 homes
- Chinese police tear down church cross in religion crackdown
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: ‘Obama, Obama, where are you?’
- Maine police find wife, husband, 3 children dead in home
EDITORIAL: The mailman vs. FedEx
Government monopolies shouldn’t take on private enterprise
Question of the Day
Electronic bill-paying and email have all but eliminated the ritual of pulling out envelopes and stamps to pay the rent or send a message to family and friends. As a result, post offices have less to do and officials are desperate to find an excuse to maintain bloated staffing levels.
Earlier this month, the Postal Regulatory Commission signed off on a test run for Metro Post, a scheme in which government mail would compete head-on with UPS and FedEx in providing same-day delivery service. Under the test, residents in certain San Francisco neighborhoods would be able to order items from an as-yet-unidentified online retailer before 2 p.m. and have the postman drop off the goods by 8 p.m.
The private shipping giants and local couriers already offer same-day service, but postal bureaucrats deny the goal is to leverage their monopoly position to cut into the private sector’s revenue stream. “Metro Post will not create an unfair or otherwise inappropriate competitive advantage for the Postal Service or any mailer, particularly in regard to small business concerns,” the post office wrote in an Oct. 12 submission to regulators. The pilot project could generate up to $50 million in revenue during the test period — money that would otherwise have gone into the pockets of private-sector entrepreneurs. When the state intervenes in the marketplace, such diversions are inevitable. Aside from putting couriers out of business, the online retailer who partners with the postal service will have a competitive advantage against other stores that have no special relationship with the postman.
A spokesman for UPS declined to comment directly about Metro Post, but the company has done extensive research into consumer demands. According to surveys, two-thirds of online shoppers wind up selecting the most economical delivery option — not same-day or overnight delivery. They’re most interested in saving a buck.
So it’s a bit odd for the post office, not known for its promptness, to jump into this new business venture without first getting its act together. The postmaster general recently reported losing $15.9 billion in fiscal 2012. In a statement, he begged lawmakers for legislative relief during a lame-duck session. Specifically, the head postman wants permission to cut service and underfund the lavish government pensions offered to its employees. Cost reduction measures under consideration include closing 229 of 461 mail-processing facilities that would delay delivery of 80 percent of first-class mail by one day. That’s in addition to the latest hike in the cost of a stamp to 46 cents and the proposal to eliminate Saturday delivery.
Congress should cut the strings that tie the hands of the Postal Service, but not without first releasing taxpayers from the obligation of covering for the substantial losses when its operations flop. That means lawmakers should finally repeal the 140-year-old statutes that make it a crime for private companies to deliver first-class mail. Doing so puts consumers in charge of deciding what they’re willing to pay for, and at what price. This ensures the public has access to the services they really need, not what Washington politicians think they should want.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Stopping police asset-forfeiture predators
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- EDITORIAL: Cellphones, steering wheels and safety
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ship tours can foster dialogue
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Latin leaders profit from illegals
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
Get Breaking Alerts
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Tennessee storms ravage counties, wreck 10 homes
- Libya now nation at risk with weak U.S. influence; embassy closes as chaos grows
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins