President Obama’s top aides floated a budget framework to Republicans on Thursday that would call for $1.6 trillion in tax increases coupled with a promise for future spending trims in order to head off the “fiscal cliff,” an offer GOP leaders immediately rejected, saying the White House needs to “get serious” about spending cuts.
The overture by the White House marks the beginning of real, detailed discussions after weeks of negotiating over principles.
Republicans say they already have moved by agreeing to allow the government to raise revenue and that they are looking for Democrats to agree that major entitlements such as Medicare will have to be cut. But Democrats say Republicans have yet to lay out any specific taxes they will raise, nor have they given their own list of spending cuts.
“Now is the time for the Republicans to move past this happy talk about revenues — ill-defined, of course — and put specifics on the table,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, said at a news conference, surrounded by his leadership team. “The president has made his proposal. We need a proposal from them.”
The White House wish list included billions of dollars more in stimulus spending, a call to curtail Congress‘ control over the federal debt limit, a rise in the estate tax and an increase in taxes on dividends. Those last two items specifically would undo parts of President Bush’s 2001 and 2003 tax plans and are likely to be contentious among some Democrats, as well as with Republicans.
In exchange, Mr. Obama repeated his pledge to find up to $400 billion in entitlement spending cuts later, as well as to undertake an overhaul of the tax code.
The White House has signaled some flexibility. Though Mr. Obama has called for tax rates on upper-income earners to rise from 35 percent to 39.6 percent — the same rate during the Clinton administration — he and his aides privately have told key players that they would be willing to accept something less than the 39.6 percent rate.
Still, they have said that rates will have to rise somewhat.
“The president will not sign any legislation that extends the Bush-era tax cuts for the top earners in this country,” he said.
Congressional Republicans said that is out of the question. Instead, they want the additional government revenue to come from ending tax breaks and closing loopholes.
“I’ve made clear that we’ve put real concessions on the line by putting revenues on the table right upfront,” said Mr. Boehner. “Unfortunately, many Democrats continue to rule out sensible spending cuts that must be part of any significant agreement that will reduce our deficit.”
But Mr. Boehner has not laid out what specific tax breaks he would end, nor have Republicans proposed spending cuts as part of these negotiations. Instead, Mr. Boehner pointed reporters back to the House Republican budget for a list of ideas.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A collection of communities writers columns on Benghazi
We welcome you to the intimate and personal thoughts on the news and events we, as editors, watch, read, and discuss with our writers every day.
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Looking at pop culture, politics and social issues.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc