- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Gay marriage likely here to stay in Iowa
Question of the Day
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Same-sex marriage might be here to stay in Iowa.
Iowa voters decided Tuesday to retain a state Supreme Court justice who participated in the landmark 2009 ruling that made Iowa the first Midwestern state to allow gay marriage, trumping a conservative campaign to oust him. And they rejected the Republican Party’s bid to take control of the IowaSenate, where conservatives hoped to pass a constitutional amendment asking voters to limit marriage rights to unions between one man and one woman.
Instead, Iowans re-elected Democratic Senate Majority Leader Michael Gronstal of Council Bluffs, who has blocked debate of that amendment for three years. He repeatedly has said he would not allow debate on a measure that would enshrine discrimination in the Iowa Constitution, a stand that put his 30-year career on the line.
Republicans and social conservatives targeted Mr. Gronstal in the hopes of removing that roadblock on Tuesday, but he easily won re-election with 55 percent of the vote. And Mr. Gronstal announced early Wednesday that he believed Democrats would keep their slim majority in the IowaSenate, picking up the 26 seats they need to continue running the chamber.
All told, Tuesday fortified Iowa’s status as one of the earliest states to adopt gay marriage — one where the right to wed for gays and lesbians is not likely to end soon.
“There is no doubt in my mind that we have turned a corner on this issue,” said Molly Tafoya, spokeswoman for One Iowa, the state’s leading gay rights group. She said opponents of gay marriage would be unlikely to block the practice in the near future — but she stopped short of declaring it safe.
“Our opponents are well-funded, likely very, very mad today, and I imagine that they are going to dust themselves off and take a look at where they can try to influence this issue,” she said.
Greg Baker, political director for the Family Leader, a group that led unsuccessful campaigns to remove Justice David Wiggins and elect a Republican Senate majority, conceded that attempts to ban gay marriage were likely dead for the next two years. A constitutional amendment takes passage in two consecutive legislative sessions, and then approval from voters in a statewide referendum.
Mr. Baker said critics of gay marriage would spend the next year regrouping, energizing the opposition through churches and trying to bring younger voters to their cause. The best prospect at this point, he said, would be for the GOP to take control of the Iowa Legislature in the 2014 midterm elections.
“We most certainly have an uphill battle in front of us, but I don’t think the marriage issue is done in Iowa yet,” he said.
A handful of Republican Senate candidates who were opposed to gay marriage and received backing from the Family Leader lost their races. They included Sen. Merlin Bartz of Grafton and Matt Reisetter of Cedar Falls, whose Democratic rivals received backing from gay rights groups and donors.
While votes in the Senate will have a practical impact, the vote on Justice Wiggins was the clearest symbol of the state’s changing attitude toward gay rights. He was one of seven justices who joined the unanimous 2009 ruling that found that Iowa’s ban on gay marriage violated the state constitution’s equal-protection clause, ordering county clerks to start issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
After a backlash, Iowa voters in 2010 removed three of Justice Wiggins‘ colleagues from the bench when they stood for retention, an unprecedented repudiation. But on Tuesday, more than 54 percent of voters decided Judge Wiggins should keep his job — about 10 percentage points higher approval than his colleagues in 2010.
“I want to thank the people of Iowa who preserved the fairness and impartiality of Iowa’s courts and agree that equal means equal,” Judge Wiggins said Wednesday.
The jurist racked up huge margins of victory in the counties with Iowa’s three public universities, including Johnson County, where he won more than 70 percent of the vote, Story County and Black Hawk County. Two large eastern Iowa counties that are filled with swing voters — Linn and Scott — also heavily favored Judge Wiggins‘ retention.
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq