- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
FIELDS: Winning campaign advice
2012 lessons for electoral success
“How to Win an Election” is a little primer, published by Princeton University Press, that flew out of bookstores just in time for Tuesday’s election. The bright red cover reminded some older purchasers of Chairman Mao’s famous “little red book” of a generation ago. Several hundred copies seem to have found their way to President Obama’s election headquarters in Chicago.
Not that the Obama campaign actually took any of the advice about how to lie, exaggerate and make promises impossible to keep. “If a politician made only promises he was sure he could keep,” the author advises, “he wouldn’t have many friends.” Candidates are told that “there are three things that will guarantee you votes in an election: favors, hope and personal attachment.” Also this: “Know the weaknesses of your opponents — and exploit them.”
The primer, subtitled “An Ancient Guide for Modern Politicians,” was written more than 2,000 years ago by Quintus Tullius Cicero for his brother Marcus Cicero, the famed orator, who was a candidate for consul of Rome in 64 B.C., but you would have to be a resident of Mars or maybe Pluto not to see its modern relevance. There’s even a book-jacket blurb by Karl Rove. Quintus Cicero shows himself to be a master political strategist of oppositional research, organization and turnout.
The little book, translated from Latin to vernacular English by Philip Freeman, should remain on the desks of office-seekers for the next four years, its principles underlined. Candidates are told to “make good use of young people who admire you and want to learn from you, in addition to all the faithful friends who are daily at your side.”
Mitt Romney might wince at this: “You have excellent manners and are always courteous, but can be rather stiff at times. You definitely need to learn the art of flattery — a disgraceful thing in normal life but essential when you are running for office.” Successful politicians cultivate a good memory and have learned this bit of wisdom: “First, nothing impresses an average voter more than having a candidate remember him, so work every day to recall names and faces.”
A few days before the election, a young friend told me of having met Barack Obama, then a mere U.S. senator, at a Washington restaurant. When he saw her again a year later, he called her by name and recalled where they had met. She was ready to follow him to the ends of the earth, or more to the point, to the White House, twice.
These Roman insights into campaign politics acknowledge the obvious — that politics is a treacherous sport. Quintus Cicero reminds his brother to cultivate his skill as a speaker, and this is good advice “going forward” (in the new cliche) for Mr. Obama. It became clear in his second campaign that his rhetorical abilities had grown stale. He had become lazy, depending on his teleprompter, and his performance in the first debate could have cost him re-election. He had forgotten how to think on his feet, but as Mr. Romney soon saw, the president is a quick learner.
The hindsight squad already is examining every quirk and turn in the campaign, and it is learning that the president and his team played the game better than Mr. Romney. There are lessons for Republicans and conservatives here that can’t be learned in books. Every inch of the campaign must be examined to see how and why a stiff candidate the public finally warmed to and embraced with enthusiasm finally lost.
The conventional wisdom points to the changing demographics in the country, the growing diversity and the “browning” of America. According to exit polls reported by The Wall Street Journal, white voters, who accounted for 87 percent of the electorate in 1992, made up just 72 percent this year. Hispanics, on the other hand, had grown from 2 percent of the vote to 10 percent.
Many women, who would have had much to gain from a steady hand on the economy, refused to accept the fact, backed by statistics, that women now compete on an equal footing with men, and the remaining disparity in their incomes comes largely from their own choices, not employer discrimination. They’re reluctant to give up their training wheels.
“The most important part of your campaign is to bring hope to people and a feeling of goodwill toward you,” Quintus Cicero wrote to his brother 20 centuries ago. “On the other hand, you should not make specific pledges either to the Senate or to the people. Stick to vague generalities.” The Republicans should hire this guy.
Suzanne Fields is a syndicated columnist.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Soldier who hid to avoid saluting the flag to be punished in secret; Army won't release details
- EDITORIAL: Connecticut revolts against gun controls that could criminalize 300,000
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- EDITORIAL: Harry Reid's corrupt Senate house of cards
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults