As criticism of the Obama administration’s handling of the deadly Sept. 11 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, continues to grow, top Republicans on Sunday ripped the White House and accused the president’s team of putting politics ahead of the safety of American diplomats.
The mounting backlash has thrust Middle East policy and the fight against terrorists back into the spotlight of the presidential campaign with less than a month until Election Day.
The White House and the Obama campaign are “trying to sell a narrative that … al Qaeda has been dismantled — and to admit that our embassy was attacked by al Qaeda operatives undercuts that narrative,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, said on CBS‘ “Face the Nation.” “I think they’ve been misleading us, but it finally caught up with them. Either they are misleading the American people or [they’re] incredibly incompetent.”
Despite requests submitted to the State Department, the administration failed to provide additional security for the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, where Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three others were killed by terrorists more than a month ago. During the vice presidential debate Thursday, Vice President Joseph R. Biden said he and President Obama were unaware of those requests.
“We weren’t told they wanted more security. We did not know they wanted more security,” the vice president said during the faceoff with Republican vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan, a congressman from Wisconsin.
The issue has touched off a debate about the meaning of the word “we,” with Mr. Biden, arguing that “we” means he and Mr. Obama personally.
Democratic surrogates reiterated that notion.
The controversy surrounding the Benghazi attacks has stretched beyond the requests for more security and who may have been warned about them beforehand.
In the days after the attack, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice and other top officials took to the airwaves and blamed Mr. Stevens‘ death on an anti-Islamic video that sparked protests outside the consulate.
The White House eventually was forced to walk back that explanation, but critics now say presidential aides stuck to that story even after it became clear that the attack was orchestrated and carefully planned for Sept. 11.
“Why did the administration try so hard to create the wrong impression about what happened? … Folks deserve an explanation,” Sen. Rob Portman, Ohio Republican, said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.” The senator was serving as a campaign surrogate for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Ben Wolfgang is a national reporter for The Washington Times. Before coming to the Times, he spent four years as a political reporter in Pennsylvania. His focus is on education and science policy. Ben lives in southeast D.C. and has played guitar in several bands while still in Pennsylvania. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention