- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration
- White House urges GOP to act ‘urgently’ on $3.7 billion request for illegal immigrants
- Politicians, criminals using ‘right-to-be-forgotten’ law EU courts forced upon Google
- Combat fatigue: elite special forces troops are ‘fraying,’ Gen. Joseph Votel warns
- German foreign minister to meet Kerry to discuss spying claims
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: ‘Get yourself some firearms’
Door-to-door ground game walks fine line
Question of the Day
“I think that was blatantly obvious,” canvasser Rosemary Storaska, an economics teacher at a public school, told the homeowner.
“People focus on what they see — in fact, can’t escape — on the airwaves. But this other spending is a big deal,” said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks political spending. “The investment is substantial, the work especially counters the unions’ longtime advantage in the ground war, and it likely represents a foundation for such campaigns in the future.”
Democrats and some campaign finance analysts have argued that groups like Americans for Prosperity are chiefly about politics, and that their activities run afoul of the law governing nonprofits.
“It’s clear a lot of these groups’ primary purpose is to influence elections,” said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, Maryland Democrat.
The statute says nonprofits must be engaged only in “social welfare” issues, but courts said “insubstantial” political activity is acceptable. The Internal Revenue Service later clarified that ruling with language saying activity designed to promote a particular candidate may not be the groups’ “primary purpose.”
Some groups have said that means as much as 49 percent of their activity can be “express advocacy” — but they also know that the interpretation is up for debate.
Seeking to counter that, officials with Americans for Prosperity say they will spend far less on advocacy than they do on other activities.
The group already has run $32 million in political ads, but it has spent about $38 million on ads that don’t directly urge viewers to vote for a particular candidate, spokesman Levi Russell said.
All told, Americans for Prosperity will spend $100 million, up from earlier estimates of $80 million, he said, which leaves about $30 million for canvassing, phone calls, rallies, a 200-member staff and a giveaway of gasoline discounted to $1.84 a gallon — the price when Mr. Obama took office.
A challenge to unions
Americans for Prosperity’s efforts represent a conservative challenge to a tactic that has long been employed by liberal-leaning trade unions. This year, members of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) have done the vast majority of the door-to-door canvassing, knocking on 1 million doors between June and last week. To meet a goal it set this summer, canvassers will have to knock on half that number in the next three weeks alone. If it succeeds, the SEIU will dramatically outpace Americans for Prosperity on individual home visits (the group aims for 150,000 homes) and narrowly on phone calls (SEIU aims to make a total of 13 million calls).
Last weekend, SEIU members wielding iPhones knocked on 7,200 doors in Virginia.
The union’s political accounts have at least $12 million in the bank. SEIU has spent more than $9 million on pro-Democrat canvassing, including $2.3 million to take place over the next two weeks.
That money includes salaries. Workers who are members of the union have taken leave from their jobs for up to two months to canvass, with the union paying their day jobs’ salaries during that time. But it also includes money to print literature and procure vans for volunteer canvassers, in which case the money would go a lot further.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Luke Rosiak is a projects reporter on The Washington Times’ investigative team. He formerly covered lobbying and campaign finance for two watchdog groups as well as transportation for The Washington Post. Luke can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Md. couple indicted in scheme to cheat SBA on minority contracts
- As federal agencies trim fat, contracts feed billions in profits to 59 companies
- Conflict of interest in $4 billion government minority program
- $4 billion program for disadvantaged businesses lacks oversight
- Maryland's minority-contracting program gets failing grade on 'graduation'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Senate majority leader practices politics of personal destruction
- Pentagon's self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: 'We cannot afford to wait on Congress' for immigration
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- Obama seeks brisk passage of border children funding bill
- Va. Democrat reportedly seeks nude shots of Kendall Jones
- Bloomberg: Pro-gun towns must lack roads
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: 'Get yourself some firearms'
- PRUDEN: 'Dirty Harry' Reids increasing eccentricity
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- New York City creates ID card so 500K illegal immigrants can get services
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs