- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Come clean or resign
The murder of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens is not an event that we can ignore. The killing poses huge questions about our intelligence capabilities, the Department of State and the White House.
Before the attacks, Stevens informed the State Department more than once that he was in danger. The department should have given him the security he needed or ordered him home. Shortly after Stevens‘ murder, President Obama, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice and White House spokesman Jay Carney all stated it was the result of an amateur video that has been online since June.
Inconveniently for the White House, senior members of the State Department testified under oath that they knew immediately that the attack wasn’t a reaction to an old video but a terrorist attack. Those same people also testified under oath that budget considerations had nothing to do with not sending in more security, as requested by Stevens.
Let’s assume that the White House didn’t know the real story, which is incredibly hard to believe. The first time the White House said the attack was caused by this video, the department should have been on the phone to the White House to clue in the people there. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is ultimately responsible for her agency’s actions. The thought that she would not be briefed completely on something as serious as the death of an ambassador is unthinkable. Either Mrs. Clinton should resign or the White House should own up to its lies and incompetence. Someone is directly responsible for this travesty, and the families of four dead Americans deserve no less than the full, truthful story.
This is just further evidence that the current occupant of the White House shouldn’t be there.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Get Breaking Alerts
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House pushes through two-year Ryan-Murray budget deal
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact