- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
Iran may hit U.S. with first cyberattack
Question of the Day
Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta's pointed warning that the United States will strike back against a cyberattack underscores the Obama administration's rising concern that Iran could be the first country to unleash cyberterrorism on America.
Mr. Panetta's unusually strong comments last week came as former U.S. government officials and cybersecurity experts said the United States thinks Iranian-based hackers were responsible for cyberattacks that devastated computer systems of Persian Gulf oil and gas companies.
Unencumbered by diplomatic or economic ties that restrain other nations from direct conflict with the United States, Iran is an unpredictable foe that national security experts contend is not only capable but willing to use a sophisticated computer-based attack.
Mr. Panetta made it clear that the military is ready to retaliate -- though he didn't say how -- if Washington believes the nation is threatened by a cyberattack, and he made it evident that the United States would consider a pre-emptive strike.
"Iran is a country for whom terror has simply been another tool in their foreign policy toolbox, and they are a country that feels it has less and less to lose by breaking the norms of the rest of the world," said Stewart Baker, former assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security and now in private law practice.
"If anybody is going to release irresponsible, unlimited attacks, you'd expect it to be Iran."
National security experts have long complained that the administration should be more open about what the military could and would do if the United States were to be the victim of cyberattacks. They argue that such deterrence worked in the Cold War with Russia and would help convince would-be attackers that an assault on America would have dire consequences.
Mr. Panetta took the first steps toward answering those critics in a speech that analysts said was a thinly veiled warning to Iran and the opening salvo in the campaign to convince Tehran that any cyberattack against America would trigger a swift and deadly response.
"Potential aggressors should be aware that the United States has the capacity to locate them and hold them accountable for actions that harm America or its interests," he said in a speech in New York to the Business Executives for National Security.
While he did not directly connect Iran to the Gulf cyberattacks, he warned that Iran's abilities were expanding.
The presumed Iranian cyberattacks hit the Saudi Arabian state oil company Aramco and Qatari natural gas producer RasGas using a virus, known as Shamoon, which can spread through computers networks and ultimately destroy files by overwriting them.
In his speech, Mr. Panetta said the Shamoon virus replaced crucial system files at Aramco with the image of a burning U.S. flag. He said it also overwrote all data, rendering more than 30,000 computers useless and forcing their replacement. He said the Qatar attack was similar.
"This one worries me," said Richard Bejtlich, chief security officer for the Virginia-based cybersecurity firm Mandiant.
"I'm not an alarmist, but when I saw that 30,000 computers at Saudi Aramco got just deleted, that was a big deal. You don't see the Chinese government, you don't see the Russian government, or even their patriotic hackers go out and delete anything, for the most part."
From the Iranians' point of view, however, attacks against the United States may be justified because they have been hit hard by American sanctions leveled on their country because of its suspected nuclear weapons program.
Iran also believes that the United States and Israel were behind the Stuxnet cyberattack that forced the temporary shutdown of thousands of centrifuges at a nuclear facility there in 2010.
Frank Cilluffo, , a former special assistant for homeland security to President George W. Bush, said U.S. authorities have suspected Iran of trying to plot cyberattacks against American targets, including nuclear plants. He said that Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps appears to now be trying to bring some hacker groups under its control.
"Iran has been doing a lot of cyber-saber-rattling," said Mr. Cilluffo, now director of George Washington University's Homeland Security Policy Institute. "What they lack in capabilities, they more than make up for in intent."
TWT Video Picks
Out of "the shadows," they demand citizenship without consequences
- House GOP resurrects border bill, predicts successful Friday vote
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- ON THE RUN: Competition for Redskins backup running back is heating up
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors