- Argentina beats Dutch in shootout to reach World Cup final
- Tanard Jackson suspended indefinitely by NFL — again
- FAA investigating fireworks drone flights
- Pentagon: We’ll give Obama a drone strike with al-Baghdadi’s name on it
- Marine in Mexican custody to get day in court after 101 days
- Senate OKs San Antonio mayor as housing secretary
- NFL star likely fooled by Marine impostor who accepted first-class plane ticket
- Sen. Ted Cruz tweets Obama directions from fundraisers to border towns
- Israel hits key Hamas targets in Gaza offensive
- Ten-year sentence for New Orleans’ Nagin on graft charges
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Romney supports foundational values
Question of the Day
As we approach this watershed presidential election, what questions are most important? Economics and jobs are being given the pre-eminent attention by the media. Equally relevant, though, is the moral direction in which each candidate will lead the nation.
President Obama does not support the Judeo-Christian doctrines regarding heterosexual marriage. An example is his abandonment of the Defense of Marriage Act, which was passed by Congress in 1996 and signed by President Clinton. In late 2011, Mr. Obama instructed Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. to cease enforcing it. Until Congress repeals it or the U.S. Supreme Court rules that it is unconstitutional, it is a valid law, and no president has the authority to decide unilaterally it is defunct.
Moreover, having read of the consequences of legalizing homosexual “marriage” in the Netherlands and Norway, I don’t want it here. When it becomes permissible, polygamy and other depraved unions will follow, and our once-great nation will be morally broken forever. Mr. Obama has voiced his approval of homosexual “marriage,” and the Democratic Party has added it to the party’s 2012 platform. I maintain that heterosexual marriage and the stable family make up the foundation of our society. Abandoning that pillar will lead us down the slippery slope to debauchery and the breakdown of law and order.
Homosexuals have the same political and economic rights under our Constitution as every American. Marriage, however, is not addressed in the Constitution. Homosexual “marriage” therefore must be decided in each state’s legislature. Whenever it has been on the ballot — even in California — it always has been defeated.
GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney has publicly stated that he believes marriage is the union of a man and a woman. Based on his values, I am supporting Mr. Romney for president. The sturdiness and virtues in America come from the strength of our conventional families. If that structure declines, our country also will diminish in stature, for we cannot survive the further corruption of our traditional marriage covenant.
ROBERT L. WICHTERMAN
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Ted Cruz
Banning speech with a constitutional amendment is playing with fire
Get Breaking Alerts
- GOP: Lerner warned IRS employees to hide information from Congress
- GORDON: Russia plays its own game away from the World Cup
- ISTOOK: Flying illegals home would be 99.5 percent cheaper than Obamas plan
- White House plans for bowling alley upgrades abruptly canceled
- Obama requests $3.7 billion to fight surge of illegals
- Colorado man offers Obama a toke of marijuana a Rocky Mountain 'high'
- Islamic militants aim to take Baghdad airport
- Gun advocates credit new concealed carry laws for sharp drop in Chicago murder rate
- Power grab: EPA wants to garnish wages of polluters
- Malaysian MP not sorry for tweeting 'long live Hitler' after Germany win