- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Don’t condemn officers out of hand
Question of the Day
The trial taking place in Prince George’s County of two veteran county police officers for their alleged actions against a University of Maryland student needs to be approached with caution and a careful review of the trial proceedings (“Defense: UMd. student beaten by P.G. police provoked attack,” Web, Monday).
Things are not always what they appear to be. Though police brutality should never be condoned or accepted, the general public tends to lack an understanding of what the police deal with on the street. Mounted units are frequently brought into situations where there are large congregations of people, particularly when the potential for violence exists. Horse-mounted units are effective for crowd control and maintaining calm. What is notable in the case of the University of Maryland student is that a horse became agitated, which suggests the student may have demonstrated aggressiveness or disobeyed officer commands.
While some may point to a historic record of the county police as a violent bunch, the Prince George’s County Police Department has many proud achievements. Many of the rioting students at the University of Maryland have been known historically to be violent, disruptive and destructive. When student offenders appear in court before a judge, they are usually well-dressed in tailored clothes, a far cry from their appearance and demeanor at the arrest scene.
The officers on trial are veteran and tenured cops who have a lot to lose if convicted. With any common sense, no reasonable officer would risk his livelihood or career without warranted cause, knowing he could be caught on video in this modern age. There is likely a lot more to this case than meets the eye. Hopefully, the jury will objectively weigh all the evidence thoroughly and carefully and recognize that any iota of doubt needs to result in an acquittal.
KAREN L. BUNE
Criminal justice consultant
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- EPSTEIN: All IRS roads lead to the archivist
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- KUHNER: Will Russia-Ukraine be Europe's next war?
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war