- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
SNYDER: Lance Armstrong has no more room to backpedal
Question of the Day
When Lance Armstrong’s moment of truth finally arrived, after years of avoidance, deception and misdirection, he ignored the advice of the sneaker company that recently disowned him.
Nike says “Just do it.”
Armstrong just blew it.
In the cyclist’s first public comments since the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency released an exhaustive report detailing his use of performance-enhancing drugs, the seven-time Tour de France winner didn’t come clean. He didn’t admit what many observers considered painfully obvious for more than a decade. He didn’t use the moment to confess his deeds while continuing to profess his cause.
Instead, the same man who vehemently denied doping since his first Tour de France victory in 1999, the same man who disparaged former teammates who simply told the truth about him, and the same man who vowed to fight accusations until his dying breath, skirted the issue like a pile-up in the peloton.
During opening remarks Friday at the 15th anniversary celebration of his Livestrong Foundation, Armstrong merely said he has been through a “difficult couple of weeks.”
Opportunity missed. Empathy denied.
I’m not suggesting that Armstrong should have grabbed the mic and offered a drawn-out apology for duping millions of supporters who believed his claims of innocence (no matter how outrageous his protestations grew). But his comments should have made a direct connection to USADA’s 1,000-plus page report — that includes sworn testimony from 26 people, including 15 riders — alleging a long-running conspiracy involving banned substances, blood transfusions and sophisticated measures to avoid positive drug tests.
Armstrong should have indicated some measure of regret and remorse. At the very least, he should have employed the language of vague acknowledgment, tossing in well-worn phrases such as “poor decisions” and “bad choices.”
The crowd of 1,700 gave him a standing ovation before he spoke, showing support that former sponsors such as Anheuser-Busch and bike manufacturer Trek failed to offer. Nike, arguably Armstrong’s greatest enabler, tried to sound clueless in severing its relationship, citing “seemingly insurmountable evidence that Lance Armstrong participated in doping and misled Nike for more than a decade.”
Hypocritical as the act is, Nike had no choice but to drop Armstrong. He’s now a toxic asset for premier corporate brands, which are interested in the appearance of appropriateness more than actual propriety. Nike was wise, though, in covering itself on both ends, asserting its continued backing of Livestrong, which has raised $500 million to help people fighting cancer since Armstrong started the foundation following his own diagnosis in 1996.
Separating Armstrong the Inspiring Survivor from Armstrong the Doping Cyclist shouldn’t be difficult. The fact that his cycling victories were chemically-aided (against fields of similarly-assisted cyclists) doesn’t taint his victory against testicular cancer that had spread to his lungs, abdomen and brain, leaving him with a 40 percent survival chance after surgery.
“The mission is bigger than me,” he told the crowd Friday. “It’s bigger than any individual.” Armstrong said he has been asked repeatedly how he’s doing. “I say, ‘I’ve been better, but I’ve also been worse.’”
Worse could come Monday, when the International Cycling Union is expected to announce whether it will accept USADA’s findings. If that cycling body does not appeal the sanctions, including Armstrong’s lifetime ban, the Tour de France has indicated it will vacate all of Armstrong’s victories from 1999-2005.
The upcoming decision won’t alter the guilty verdict most of us reached way before last week’s revelations. The only question is how long Armstrong sticks to the silent treatment. He certainly can’t resume his previous strategy of deny, deny, deny.
Continuing that lie would be more shameful than the crime itself (if you want to call it a crime; I don’t).
Armstrong’s story is no less incredible just because he was a pedaling pharmacy. The number of patients he has helped is just as great. Nothing he’s done on his bike can reduce the good he’s done on his feet, the innumerable contributions to cancer awareness and research.
Some folks, like former Livestrong supporter Michael Birdsong of Salt Lake City, don’t get it. “The charity was established and publicized and got their funds based on a fraud,” he told CNN. “The whole thing is founded on a lie. I would like my money back. We donated under false pretenses.”
Others, like Bob Kile of Kent, Wash., have a more reasoned view. “If Lance doped, that certainly takes away from his athletic wins,” Kile told CNN. “However, to survive what he did and come back at all is impressive. To come back and create good like he did with Livestrong is even better.”
Agreed. Armstrong just needs to come clean and move on.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Deron Snyder is an award-winning journalist and Washington Times sports columnist with more than 25 years of experience. He has worked at USA Today and his column was syndicated in Gannett’s 80-plus newspapers from 2000-2009, appearing in The Arizona Republic, The Indianapolis Star, The Detroit News and many others. Follow Deron on Twitter @DeronSnyder or email him at email@example.com.
- SNYDER: Michael Sam a pioneer, but Tony Dungy doesn't need to be
- SNYDER: Robert Griffin III, Jay Gruden perfect together — for now
- SNYDER: Nationals flush with possibilities as second half kicks in
- SNYDER: Emmanuel Mudiay's decision to skip college another step toward sea change
- SNYDER: Like it or not, Derek Jeter is reason to watch All-Star game
Latest Blog Entries
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq