- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Middle Eastern firm’s deal to manage U.S. cargo port raises security concerns
- Bob McDonnell’s defense: Lonely wife developed ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House Republicans unveil bill to speed deportations of border children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
WILLIAMS: Dash to judgment and the ugly new face of racism
Question of the Day
When people profit from bad news, they won’t tell you about good news.
Here is the good news: We are seeing a generation of American blacks who are better-educated, more successful, more pro-business and, therefore, drawn to policy positions vastly different from those of their parents and grandparents.
The bad news: The stereotype remains that blacks are incapable of seeing beyond the decades-old cultural mandate that says if you support Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, as in the case of actress Stacey Dash, you are a sellout or traitor to your race.
It was encouraging to see Russell Simmons, a staunch supporter of President Obama, come to the defense of Miss Dash and take the so-called black “community” to task for their blatant racism and hate speech.
Monolithic stereotypes do not give blacks credit for being able to augment their political views to fit changing social dynamics and differentiate, without the prism of race, what is in their best interests. They imply that blacks are more prone to emotional, rather than intellectual, decisions.
Stacey Dash is an individual. She cannot be reduced to where she was born, what she looks like or any other fact about her. She makes her own decisions — and that’s a good thing.
If Stacey Dash should support her own people, as suggested by many outrageous comments from the ignorant class, then why can’t we make the argument that whites should support their own to look out for their best interests as well? It suggests that many blacks are followers, incapable of taking control over their own fates, blind in recognizing their own embarrassing and unapologetic new, acceptable racism. Shattering these stereotypes is not easy, especially when organizations purporting to act in the best interests of black America have turned these stereotypes into a small cottage industry.
Are a vast number of blacks more prone to react, rather than contemplate the issues that have the greatest impacts on their lives? Are many blacks expressing the ugly new racism in America that many media outlets are uncomfortable in taking them to task and holding them accountable for this hate speech and dark racism? They will if we keep telling them they have to.
Shattering stereotypes among many blacks and liberals in this nation is essential to achieving social equality.
What kinds of role models do we want for young people? Do we want them to aspire to a herd mentality, to going with the flow? Or do we want them to think for themselves, to ask questions? How much of the ugliness of history, the brutality, the cruelty, the racism and discrimination that has been inflicted on us has come precisely from this mindset? Take, for example, the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd of West Virginia. He joined the Ku Klux Klan not because he was racist, but because of the political connections of doing so. He joined because so many other people had joined. The herd mentality leads us only down the path of destruction.
Those who vote on skin color just want to know one thing: What does the candidate look like? But the intelligent voter wants to know about the issues.
I’m certainly not saying that all black Democrats and liberals are mindless; I’m just saying that, if blacks wish to vote for the president, they should do it for defensible reasons, based upon facts about the important issues.
I say this as someone who voted for Mr. Obama in 2008. I, as many Americans of all stripes, had an open mind to him in those days, and now, our minds are open to the reality of the facts. The facts tell me that Mr. Obama has been a president who refuses to campaign on his record and chooses to castigate and demonize his opponent. Have you ever wondered why his campaign ads are so negative and dark? It’s because he has no proud or inspiring record to tout to we the people. Many of us are still looking for the “hope and change” he promised as a candidate.
For that matter, do we really want a bad president to represent any community? This is what will happen when people care only about is the candidate’s race. We must demand quality leadership: Only we will pay the price if we don’t. No community large or small will not be respected or taken seriously: We will look to everyone else as a herd of followers who can be tricked easily.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- McCLAUGHRY: Finish off the "Islamic State" quickly and cheaply
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Kerry's credibility questioned as fighting in Gaza rages
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world