- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Poll sees rising resistance to California tax hike
Latest poll shows 9 percent drop among likely voters
Question of the Day
California Gov. Jerry Brown’s $6 billion tax-increase initiative is losing steam as it enters the final stretch of the race, according to a poll released Thursday.
Just 46 percent of Californians surveyed plan to vote for the measure Nov. 6, down from 55 percent a month ago, according to the USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll. After an expensive lobbying campaign against the measure, 42 percent now say they would vote against the tax increases.
A separate survey released late Wednesday by the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California also found a tight contest, with 48 percent of likely voters saying they would support the governor’s plan, while 44 percent would vote no and 8 percent were undecided.
The polls represent the first time that support for Mr. Brown’s Proposition 30 has fallen below 50 percent, and the trends are not favorable for the governor. Mr. Brown has campaigned tirelessly for the measure, which would temporarily raise the income tax on the state’s highest earners and the sales tax in order to fill a yawning $6 billion “budget gap” in state finances.
Dan Schnur, director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at USC, said in a statement Thursday that Mr. Brown has tried to balance the push for higher taxes with fiscal responsibility, even taking away state-funded cellphones from public employees, but that “voters don’t see it yet.”
“They buy his argument about the need for taxes to fund schools, but they don’t think sending money to Sacramento is the right way to do it,” said Mr. Schnur. California voters have rejected nine out of the past 10 tax-increase initiatives, including a proposal earlier this year to raise the tobacco tax to fund cancer research.
“If they can’t pass that, they’re not going to pass this,” said California Republican Party Chairman Tom Del Beccaro.
A loss by Proposition 30 would trigger automatic cuts in public education that proponents say would result in a shortened K-12 school year and significant tuition increases for students in the California university systems.
Mr. Brown told The Associated Press he wants to ensure that voters know the consequences of a Proposition 30 defeat.
“I don’t want anybody to wake up the day after the election and be surprised,” Mr. Brown said Wednesday between stops in Inglewood and San Diego.
Opponents of Proposition 30 dismiss the threats as a scare tactic designed to frighten voters. The “No on 30” campaign, which has been outspent by the public-employee unions backing Proposition 30 by at least 2 to 1, released a statement Thursday calling the measure a “budget gimmick.”
“Even with $48 million to fund misleading advertisements, voters are seeing through the governor’s deceptive campaign,” said John Kabateck, executive director of the National Federation of Independent Business of California. “Voters understand that Prop 30 is just another budget gimmick that doesn’t guarantee any money for the classroom, and can be spent on anything the politicians want.”
Supporters of Proposition 30 argue that most of the $6 billion would go toward schools as a result of Proposition 98, a 1998 ballot measure that requires a certain percentage of the budget to be spent on education.
Proposition 30 wasn’t alone in an election year that may find California voters just saying “no” across the board. Proposition 38, a competing tax-increase measure, received the support of just 28 percent of voters, while Proposition 32, a “paycheck protection” measure that would also ban union and corporate political donations, had 39 percent support.
The poll questioned 1,504 registered California voters from Oct. 15 through 21, with a margin of error of 2.9 percent.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Plagiarism scandal threatens Senate campaign of Montana Democrat John Walsh
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Act would create tax-free savings accounts for the disabled
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- Carson wins straw poll as conservatives focus on winning battle of ideas
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq