- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
- U.S., China race to finish line on ‘invisibility cloak’
- Obama ‘cavalier’ in hiding foreign aid order, judge rules
- Prince Charles: Muslims are driving Christians from Mideast through persecution
- Gitmo’s first commander: Close the prison down
- Google’s newest photography find: Just wink and shoot
- Detroit’s Heidelberg art project hit by 8 fires in 8 months
- Pa. police pull people over for random DNA tests for feds
- NASA pushing hard to get back into space game
- Harvard student to face federal charges for bomb hoax
HAGELIN: Invest in relationships with your children
Question of the Day
Culture challenge of the week: Dickensian parenting
The elder Johnsons, both highly successful in their professional lives, took an approach to parenting that Boris describes as “character-building and toughening.” Boris and his siblings “learned to fend for themselves” as their parents continued about their own very busy lives.
In Rachel’s estimation, their parents taught them more by leaving them to function on their own than they would have by hovering over them throughout childhood. They “provided us with the essentials then got on with their own lives.”
Rachel speaks out against “wet parents” who “mollycoddle” their children in her guest chapter for the book “How Rude: Modern Manners Defined.” She mentions that her “father’s proudest boast is not that his six children all went to Oxbridge [an elite private school in London], but that he never, not once, attended a parent-teacher meeting at one of our schools.” Her mother filled her time with “much more interesting things” than guiding or engaging her children. What kinds of things? “Painting or seeing her psychiatrist,” says Rachel, who describes herself as grateful for her “Dickensian childhood.”
The Johnsons’ outspoken defense of their parents’ purposeful neglect represents the latest backlash to “helicopter” parenting — the hovering style of overinvolved parents whose children struggle to become independent adults.
But they go too far. If guiding children and attending parent-teacher conferences are “mollycoddling,” and participating in children’s lives makes one a “wet parent,” then count me in. We can acknowledge the problems of indulgent parenting without going to the extreme of advocating neglect and indifference.
How to save your family: Invest in relationships
Parents are right to enjoy their own interests, friends and careers — personal identity doesn’t go by the wayside once children join the family. But a mature and generous approach to parenting integrates those personal interests into the larger vision of family life. Parents are not entitled to pursue their own interests at the expense of caring for the little ones they brought into the world. Nor should they want to.
Becoming a parent means making the conscious decision to place someone else’s welfare ahead of your own desires. Once we make that commitment, real life demands that we adapt and “flex” as needed to fulfill that larger purpose of raising children who will grow into men and women of character.
For each family, the “how tos” might look different. Perhaps it means changing work schedules to allow for preschool play dates, giving up a golf game to cheer at a child’s soccer tourney, or forgoing that favorite TV show in favor of checking homework. Making the commitment to invest ourselves in our parenting gives us the perspective and strength to be less indulgent when our children need firmness and more nurturing when they need loving support.
The time we spend nurturing our children provides invaluable benefits to our children in other ways as well. Research shows that the time we spend with our children — reading to them, playing games and eating family meals together — gives our children a better chance for success and happiness later in life.
A powerful predictor that success and happiness are the strengths of their emotional connections. Connections to loving parents are the lynchpin of future relationships. Children without caring parents invested in their lives have a much harder time opening up to others, setting appropriate boundaries and parenting their own children correctly. That is not to say they cannot do it, but that it is proved to be more difficult.
Our children are born “preprogrammed to bond with one very significant person,” not predisposed to sail through life in lonely “independence,” says Helpguide.org, a nonprofit resource for health information. They are hard-wired to connect with people. Infants’ brains develop better, and more rapidly, when they feel secure and loved by a parent. That crucial stage of development includes the propensity for attachment — and determines an individual’s later capability for strong relationships.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Army to cut up to 4,000 captains and majors
- 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson: Gays 'wont inherit the kingdom of God'
- Prevention of school massacre shoots down arguments for Colorado gun control laws
- Zadzooks: The Joker sixth scale figure review (Sideshow Collectibles)
- CARUSO: Driving off Russian aggression with U.S. natural gas
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Right-brain investing in a left-brain world. You can do it. I can help.
News and views on the Civil War.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow