- Chambliss: Downed jet ultimately goes back to Putin
- Perdue strategy: Run against Reid, Obama, Pelosi
- White House: More changes to contraception mandate coming
- ‘Operation Normandy’ set to send 3,500 volunteers to border to ‘stop an invasion’
- Netanyahu’s spokesman: Safe to fly to Israel
- Oregon vandals smear cars with doughnuts, pastries, chocolate bars
- Obama’s ‘Katrina moment’ leaves his favorability factor at 42 percent
- Feds tout nearly 200 arrests, $625K in seized cash in Texas border crackdown
- Joy Behar: Sarah Palin should be ‘turning letters over on some game show’
- Rhino poacher in South Africa sentenced to 77 years in jail
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Candidates’ tax-plan failure
Question of the Day
One of the most important issues in the coming presidential election is tax policy, and this necessitates a closer examination of both candidates’ positions. In my estimation, both men receive an F.
President Obama repeatedly has made it known that he seeks to let the George W. Bush tax cuts expire for higher-income Americans, increasing the progressivity of the tax code to take more from those at the top so as to redistribute their wealth. Not satisfied with a top federal income tax rate of 35 percent, the president would allow the rate to increase to at least 39.6 percent, the levy that was in effect under President Clinton.
Challenger Mitt Romney had little to say about tax policy until he was pushed by the right wing of the Republican Party to propose something dramatic — and he did, a stunning 20 percent across-the-board reduction in current tax rates. When Mr. Romney was pressed to explain how we would pay for this initiative, he proposed limiting deductions, but to date, he has not stated which deductions would be limited or eliminated.
Neither candidate has proposed a fair, simple system of taxation in which the federal income tax would be eliminated in favor of a value-added tax or consumption tax. President Obama never would propose such a system because it would have an impact on his ability to tax the wealthy disproportionately. One can only speculate why Mr. Romney has not proposed such a system.
It is understandable that businesses are refraining from hiring and spending, given that no one knows what tax policy or rates will be in effect beginning next year. Ours is a nation operating on stopgap spending plans. Congress and the president shamefully failed to approve a budget even when the Democrats controlled both Houses.
OREN M. SPIEGLER
Upper Saint Clair, Pa.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Retailer pays a price for getting too close to Obama
Get Breaking Alerts
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- HURT: The cost of 'free' water in Detroit
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare in intensive care
- Pentagon team dispatched to Ukraine amid crisis with Russia
- Contrasting judgments on Obama's health care hours apart; appeals court calls subsidies unlawful