- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
- Detroit porch shooting trial: Suspect says he didn’t know gun was loaded
- U.S. Navy admiral ‘receptive’ to giving Chinese counterpart a tour of carrier
- Islamic State orders female genital mutilation for Mosul girls, U.N. says
- U.N. school in Gaza caught in cross-fire; 15 killed
- Obama encourages ICE to stand down, say former border agents
Two GOP senators criticize stimulus for battery company
Question of the Day
Each job created with federal stimulus cash through the Obama administration’s advanced battery manufacturing program cost more than $158,000 and many of them likely were temporary, according to an analysis released Wednesday by two senior Republicans.
Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and John Thune of South Dakota, members of the Senate Finance Committee, cited figures they obtained after pressing for verification of administration claims of the economic benefits of the $2 billion program funded under the stimulus bill.
“The taxpayers paid $2 billion for a pretty lackluster return,” Mr. Grassley said. “The administration billed this program as an all-around success toward creating jobs, but the results are a lot more mixed. The program cost $158,556 per job, including jobs that were later cut.”
Mr. Grassley noted that the stimulus package included a quarter-billion-dollar grant to a now-bankrupt company, A123 Systems, adding that each job it created with that company cost taxpayers more than $317,000.
“The expense is significant, especially when many of the jobs were temporary. The administration should not overstate the value of this program as a boon to economic recovery. The facts show otherwise,” he said. “Adding insult to injury, A123 executives reportedly are seeking to retain $4.2 million in bonuses through the bankruptcy process.”
The $317,000 figure was first reported Tuesday by The Washington Times.
Mr. Thune said President Obama’s stimulus program contributed to America’s $16 trillion national debt and record federal deficits of more than $1 trillion year after year.
“The Obama administration took nearly $2 billion of taxpayers’ hard-earned money so the federal government could spend more,” he said. “Spending $158,556 per job, many of which were temporary, was a waste of taxpayer dollars and failed to create the economic growth the president promised when he jammed his stimulus through Congress.”
Last month, the Energy Department posted on its website an update on the advanced battery manufacturing program in response to the bankruptcy of A123 Systems.
The update said the program awarded $2 billion in grants to 29 companies to build or retool 45 manufacturing facilities in 20 states to build advanced batteries, engines, drive trains and other key components for electric vehicles.
The update said: “From Columbus, Georgia, to Batesville, Arkansas, to Brownstown, Michigan, our investments in manufacturing advanced batteries and other electric vehicle components are putting Americans to work and helping make our country more competitive.”
When the lawmakers pressed for documentation, they said they received data showing that 12,613.77 jobs were “created” by the advanced battery manufacturing initiative from the signing of the stimulus act on Feb. 13, 2009, to the present.
Given the $2 billion cost of the program, they said that represents $158,556.88 per job created. They also noted that the Energy Department does not track how long the jobs are retained, meaning many of those jobs are likely temporary. Also, they said, the data showed that the program did not achieve the overall goal of the stimulus program to create jobs as rapidly as possible.
Mr. Grassley and Mr. Thune said they remain concerned that the Energy Department’s claim that its Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Manufacturing Initiative was a success is not supported by the statistical evidence and they will continue to press for more information on the value the program provided to taxpayers.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- With bombs away, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants make their play
- Medical-device company exec admits to bilking shareholders of $400M
- Justice Dept: Florida's disabled children unnecessarily put in nursing facilities
- Philadelphia mobster sentenced to 11 years as city cleans up crime
- Man gets 11 years in Philadelphia mob crackdown
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Whistleblowers flood VA with lawsuits despite apology
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Astronaut shares 'saddest photo' from space: Bombs bursting over Israel, Gaza
- EDITORIAL: Obamacare enrollees faking for freebies
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq