- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Debate is one thing; attacks are another
Question of the Day
That dark cloud moving across the political landscape isn't the remnants of Tropical Storm Isaac, it's the incredibly cynical slash-and-burn tactics of the political hard left. It's striking how ad hominem the left's attacks have become. I'm not talking about attacks from the outer fringe, but rather from party leaders and the candidates themselves. Make no mistake, the right has some elements that are out there, too, but the left has more fringe than a vintage flapper dress.
If you're trying to tell me that the Tea Party is the American Taliban, or there's a Republican "war on women" in play, just go away. You're intellectually vapid. You're incapable of understanding issues and what the other side is about. On the other hand, if you want to debate with facts, or in their absence, reasonable, supportable opinions, have at it. I'm ready to engage.
I happen to be pro-choice (with reasonable restrictions), but I'm not obtuse enough to think that those who hold the opposite view are women-hating Nazis. Why? Because I can see that it is perfectly sane for one to consider, whether for religious reasons or other reasons, that the sanctity of a human life trumps all. It's not outrageous to want to protect a completely helpless and vulnerable fetus. In fact, it's pretty noble.
Similarly, I fully support one's right to contraception. But I don't deem those who might have a different view on the matter to be misogynists. Why? Because I recognize that some are informed by their religion, which happens to propound such a belief.
If you're a believer in big government and think you can support that view with facts and figures, terrific. I respect your opinions, and I'm ready to hear your thoughts and share mine. But if you think Mitt Romney, a guy who has been a tireless, lifelong giver to his community and church, a person who has consistently put women in positions of power, and a man who believes strongly in lifting up the lower and middle classes through pro-business capitalism, is anti-women or "out to get" the less fortunate, don't waste my time or yours. You shouldn't be worried about voter-ID laws; you should be deeply concerned about a voter-IQ law.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
Get Breaking Alerts
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
- Sarah Palin's online channel hits snag as Stephen Colbert buys similar URL
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for