- Florida judge slaps GOP’s redistricting plans: You ‘made a mockery’ of process
- Muslims give Obama high marks over first half of 2014
- Pennsylvania sends draft notices to 14K dead men
- KISS rocker Gene Simmons touts 1 percent life: ‘It’s fantastic’
- Texas shooting suspect had faced other charges
- Californian who sold secret to China sentenced to 15 years in prison
- Couple, 3 kids among 7 killed in Massachusetts apartment fire
- Angry mom to Obama: Feds let illegal immigrant stay and ‘KILL my son!’
- Mideast hostilities ratchet as rockets from Lebanon strike Israel
- Mexican train carrying 1,300 migrants headed toward U.S. derails
Israel hints it will keep pressing U.S. on Iran
Question of the Day
JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel‘s leader suggested in an interview Thursday that he’ll keep publicly pressing the United States to get tougher on Iran, despite the strains his remarks have caused with the Obama administration.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s remarks appear to have been aimed at rattling the United States into action for fear Israel might otherwise soon attack Iran on its own. But his heightened rhetoric has raised tensions with the White House and even prompted a leading Jewish U.S. senator to take the extraordinary step of publicly rebuking him.
Mr. Netanyahu repeatedly has warned that Iran is getting dangerously close to acquiring a nuclear bomb and has been lobbying Washington for weeks to spell out what conditions would touch off a U.S.-led attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.
In a thinly veiled swipe at the U.S., he said earlier this week that “those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don’t have a moral right to place a red light before Israel.”
But Washington, which insists it won’t let Iran become a nuclear power, has refused to be specific, despite Israel‘s implicit threat to act unilaterally if the U.S. doesn’t take a tough public position.
The spat has become unusually public, prompting President Obama to phone Mr. Netanyahu earlier this week and to follow up the call with a rare late-night White House statement denying reports of a rift. Mr. Netanyahu’s office also has said the two men had a “good conversation.”
In a newspaper interview Thursday, Mr. Netanyahu suggested he won’t abandon his calls for the U.S. to set “red lines,” telling the Jerusalem Post that he was “not exactly shy” about expressing his views on Israel‘s security interests.
“When I feel I need to speak out, I do,” he said.
The U.S. also suspects Tehran seeks to become a nuclear power and has been leading international efforts to try to persuade Iran to abandon suspect elements of its nuclear program.
But Washington wants to give diplomacy and tough sanctions more time to try to pressure Tehran. And in a message aimed at Israel, it said several times this week that deadlines or “red lines” are counterproductive.
While Washington has tried to downplay reports of a rift, a leading Jewish U.S. senator who solidly supports Israel took the rare step of publicly criticizing Mr. Netanyahu in a letter to the Israeli leader posted on her website.
“I write to you as one of Israel‘s staunchest supporters in Congress to express my deep disappointment over your remarks that call into question our country’s support for Israel and commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons,” wrote Sen. Barbara Boxer, California Democrat. “Your remarks are utterly contrary to the extraordinary United States-Israel alliance, evidenced by President Obama’s record and the record of Congress.”
Israel enjoys strong backing in Congress, and it is extremely unusual for its supporters there to question the Israeli government in such an open fashion. Mrs. Boxer’s decision to do so appears to suggest that at least some of his congressional supporters feel he has gone too far.
Netanyahu spokesman Mark Regev had no immediate comment on the letter.
The possibility of Israel‘s acting alone is a source of concern in Washington because of its potential to set off retaliatory attacks by Iran and its proxies in the region. U.S. officials have made it clear they oppose a unilateral Israeli attack, with the U.S. military chief, Gen. Martin Dempsey, recently saying he would “not want to be complicit” in such an assault.
TWT Video Picks
Senate majority leader practices politics of personal destruction
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- PRUDEN: 'Dirty Harry' Reids increasing eccentricity
- Pennsylvania sends draft notices to 14K dead men: 'We made a mistake'
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- IRS employee suspended for pro-Obama activities
- Obama seeks brisk passage of border children funding bill
- Israel rejects talk of cease-fire; Hamas targets suspected nuke site
- Amid border crisis, Obama to take 15-day vacation in Martha's Vineyard
- BRUCE: The feds plot to steal your paycheck
- GOP: Lerner warned IRS employees to hide information from Congress
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs
U.S.-Ghana World Cup opener