CHICAGO — Chicago teachers uncomfortable with a tentative contract offer decided Sunday to remain on strike, insisting they first wanted to consult with their full membership before deciding whether to end an acrimonious standoff with Mayor Rahm Emanuel that will keep 350,000 students out of class for at least two more days.
Emanuel fired back Sunday night by instructing city attorneys to seek a court order forcing Chicago Teachers Union members back into the classroom. “This was a strike of choice and is now a delay of choice that is wrong for our children,” he said in a statement.
Meeting a week after the start of the city’s first teachers strike in 25 years, the union’s 800-member House of Delegates didn’t hold a planned formal vote on whether to suspend the strike. They had received a summary of a proposed settlement worked out over the weekend with officials from the nation’s third largest school district.
Presented with a choice on whether to ask members to vote on a contract that union president Karen Lewis had at one point called “a fight for the very soul of public education,” the union’s members told their leaders they needed more time to talk to the rank and file. The contract would base teacher evaluations in part on how well students succeed and whether laid-off teachers would have first chance at open jobs in the district.
The union will meet again Tuesday, after the end of the Rosh Hashana, the Jewish new year.
“We felt more comfortable being able to take back what’s on the table and let our constituents look at it and digest it,” said Dean Refakes, a physical education teacher at Gompers Elementary School. “We can have a much better decision come Tuesday.”
That timeline, however, means the soonest classes could resume would be Wednesday. That frustrated both Emanuel and some parents, who learned late at night a week ago Sunday that a flurry of last-minute negotiations had failed to produce a contract agreement and that the strike was on.
“I think a week is a long time to be wasting time. Another week would be murder. I don’t think it’s right,” said Beatriz Fierro, the mother of a fifth grader. “They should be back in school. I don’t think teachers should be on strike that long.”
Other parents continued to stand with the teachers. As teachers walked picket lines in the past week and rallied Saturday in a park near downtown, they were joined by parents who have had to scramble to find baby sitters or a supervised place for children to pass the time.
“As much as we want our kids back in school, teachers need to make sure they have dotted all their I’s and crossed their T’s,” said Becky Malone, mother of a second grader and fourth grader. “What’s the point of going on strike if you don’t get everything you need out of it? For parents, it’ll be no more of a challenge than it’s been in the past week.”
Emanuel didn’t appear at a brief news conference Sunday night with city school board president David Vitale, who said 147 schools staffed with non-union workers and central office employees would be open Monday for students who are dependent on school-provided meals.
But in a statement, Emanuel was typically blunt. He accused the union of using the city’s students as “pawns in an internal dispute.” He said the strike was illegal because it endangers the health and safety of students and concerned issues that state law says cannot be grounds for a work stoppage.
“While the union works through its remaining issues, there is no reason why the children of Chicago should not be back in the classroom as they had been for weeks while negotiators worked through these same issues,” he said.
Emanuel believes the strike is illegal because state law bars teachers from walking out over evaluations and layoffs and recall, spokeswoman Sarah Hamilton said. Lewis has said the strike was not mainly about money.
But union delegate Susan Hickey, a school social worker, said many also were upset that a 4 percent pay raise rescinded by Emanuel last year was not addressed in the proposed deal and weren’t happy with some changes to health benefits. Even so, Hickey said she believes the proposed contract is one that teachers still could support.