- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
Evans bill would eliminate need for D.C. Council contract approval
Question of the Day
D.C. Council member Jack Evans plans to introduce a bill Wednesday that would remove city lawmakers’ from the contract approval process, a controversial power that allows the council to have a say in deals worth more than $1 million and has fueled suspicions of pay-to-play politics in the city.
Mr. Evans, Ward 2 Democrat and chairman of the Committee on Finance Revenue, said the bill dovetails with the city’s focus on ethics reform, including a volunteer effort known as Initiative 70 that seeks to ban direct campaign contributions from corporations.
“Just eliminate the review on contracts, and then you’ve gotten to the crux of the problem,” he said Monday. “I was here when we put (council review of contracts) in place. It’s not like it’s been here forever.”
The council began to review contracts in the 1990s. Mistrust of the city’s mayors during the decade spawned the idea, which came to fruition under the financial control board mandated by Congress, according to Mr. Evans.
“It’s supposed to serve as a check and a balance on the mayor and it doesn’t, because I would say 90 to 95 percent of the contracts we sign off on, people don’t even read ‘em,” said Mr. Evans, who has served on the council since 1991.
Mr. Evans said he does not expect his colleagues to support the proposal at the outset, but they should entertain a hearing on the subject to explore why the council has this oversight power and if it is working.
Mayor Vincent C. Gray declined to comment on the bill Monday, noting he has not had a chance to review it.
Given that it would eliminate council-driven impediments to contracts from his office, Mr. Gray is likely to lend his support for the measure.
“If I were mayor, I would,” Mr. Evans quipped.
But D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, a Democrat, said revoking council review of large city contracts “would be a mistake.” He said the body’s review process, through public hearings and documents, promotes transparency and can ensure the city gets the best deal.
Disclosure is key, rather than an outright revocation of the council’s oversight powers.
In response, Mr. Evans maintained that city lawmakers can always hold a hearing on a contract.
“The predisposition among my colleagues is they don’t want to give up that power,” he said.
Mr. Gray and Attorney General Irvin B. Nathan are also attempting to address fears of undue influence in the contracting process in a package of campaign finance reforms devised over the summer for the council’s review this fall. In it, they propose a ban on campaign contributions — from those who hold or are seeking city contracts of more than $250,000 — to candidates who could hold sway over the contract’s approval.
A grand jury is reportedly looking into the controversial awarding of the D.C. Lottery contact in 2009 to a joint venture known as DC09, a partnership between Greek lottery giant Intralot and a local partner, Veterans Services Corp. The award has been tinged by allegations of meddling by council members at the time, because an initial partnership between Intralot and another local partner, W2Tech, was withdrawn and rebid.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Obama admin.: One in 10 Obamacare forms might have errors
- Obama administration knew of key Obamacare delay in August, emails say
- House Speaker John Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
- Young millennials shun Obamacare, creating risky imbalance
- Almost 1.5 million deemed eligible for Medicaid in October alone: Obama administration
Latest Blog Entries
- Calif.: Give 'gift of health' by pledging cash for the uninsured
- Tensions hit boiling point over Obamacare enrollment figures, error rates
- Young, uninsured adults vital to Obamacare are not keen on enrolling: New Harvard poll
- Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox will promote Obamacare at Mall of America
- HealthCare.gov employs a new look once again
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- MILLER: Obamacare enrollees include 101 members of the House of Representatives
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
White House pets gone wild!