Wisconsin appeals ruling against clamp on unions

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

MADISON, Wis. — Wisconsin’s attorney general on Tuesday appealed a court ruling that repealed major parts of Gov. Scott Walker’s law effectively ending collective bargaining for most public workers.

J.B. Van Hollen also asked a judge to place his ruling on hold while the appeal is pending.

Mr. Van Hollen’s request just four days after the ruling Friday comes as school districts and local governments attempt to understand the ramifications of the decision and whether it opens the door to new negotiations previously barred with unions.

Mr. Van Hollen, a Republican, asked that Dane County Circuit Judge Juan Colas act quickly on the request to halt his ruling, which overturned the law as it pertained to school and local government workers. Not taking swift action, Mr. Van Hollen argued, would lead to chaos and further confusion, given that Mr. Walker’s law effectively ending collective bargaining has been in effect for more than a year.

“It makes no sense to force a return to a broken system before the appellate process is completed,” Mr. Van Hollen said in a statement. He filed the appeal with the state’s 4th District Court of Appeals in Madison.

Lester Pines, the attorney representing the Madison teachers union that brought the lawsuit, promised to vigorously fight the request to put the ruling on hold.

“It’s not going to be chaotic,” Mr. Pines said. “We believe that these assertions of chaos are more propaganda than anything else.”

Mr. Pines sent a separate letter to Mr. Van Hollen on Tuesday asking him to clarify whether he accepts the authority of Judge Colas to preside over the case, given that Mr. Walker, a Republican, had called Judge Colas a “liberal activist judge” who “overturned the will of the people and imposed his personal political beliefs on all of us.”

Mr. Pines, in a sternly worded letter, said it was unacceptable for Mr. Van Hollen to say nothing while his client, Mr. Walker, accused a judge of bias and prejudice.

Mr. Van Hollen told the Associated Press in an interview Monday that he didn’t want to comment on Mr. Walker’s statements or “go into Colas‘ head.” Mr. Van Hollen said “legal minds can disagree” on the merits of the ruling but he found it to be “woefully legally deficient.”

Also Tuesday, the Madison teachers union notified the school district that it wanted to begin talks on a new contract in light of the ruling. The district’s roughly 4,700 union-covered employees are working under a contract that runs through June 2013.

Madison schools Superintendent Jane Belmore has said nothing should be done given the legal uncertainties surrounding the law.

While the legal battle moved forward, those affected by Friday’s ruling continued to try to understand its ramifications.

The Wisconsin Association of School Boards posted an analysis of the ruling on its website that downplayed its significance, saying the law has not completely restored the situation that existed before the collective bargaining changes took effect last year.

The boards noted that the ruling doesn’t reinstate schools and local government “interest arbitration,” which since 1978 had given the final say in contract disputes to an independent arbitrator.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks