- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay comments
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
- U.S., China race to finish line on ‘invisibility cloak’
- Obama ‘cavalier’ in hiding foreign aid order, judge rules
- Prince Charles: Muslims are driving Christians from Mideast through persecution
- Gitmo’s first commander: Close the prison down
- Google’s newest photography find: Just wink and shoot
Dems managing expectations for upcoming convention
Question of the Day
Four years after the “hope and change” euphoria of the 2008 Democratic National Convention, party leaders said Sunday to expect a more sober gathering in Charlotte, N.C., this week.
“This is not the time to wave pompoms,” Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “It is a time to dig deep and move forward and not go back to those disastrous policies that landed us in this economic problem to begin with.”
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, chairman of the convention, said the three-day gathering would be a “working convention.”
“That’s what this convention will be about,” he said. “We have 65,000 people coming to the football stadium on Thursday. We are going to ask every one of them: Can you knock on the doors? Can you call voters?”
Answering questions on the same program about polls that show an “enthusiasm gap” that favors Republicans, Obama senior campaign adviser Robert Gibbs said, “Nobody is sitting up here saying this is 2008.”
The 2012 election is going to be close, Mr. Gibbs said, because “we live in a very closely divided electorate, and we have for quite some time, and this election was quite frankly always going to be close, but it is an important fundamental choice about where we go from here.”
On “Fox News Sunday,”David Axelrod, the Obama campaign’s senior strategist, hammered home the point that the economy was losing 800,000 jobs a month when the president took over, and the administration has turned that around to now 28 straight months of job growth.
“We’re in a better position than four years ago in our economy,” Mr. Axelrod said.
Republicans have criticized Mr. Obama for not putting forth a specific plan to improve jobs and the economy, but Mr. Axelrod threw the argument back at critics.
Of last week’s Republican National Convention, he said, “For three days, they never offered anybody a plausible alternative, never offered any ideas for how to move the economy forward,” he said. “People walked away, those voters who were trying to decide, asking, ‘What alternatives is [Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney] offering?’ “
“What you’re going to hear this week in Charlotte is a president who is going to talk about a clear plan for the future,” Mr. Axelrod said.
But Democrats also acknowledged the public’s impatience with the less-than-robust recovery of the American economy.
“It is not moving fast enough, but I do believe the American people don’t want to go back to the very policies that created the economic mess,” Mr. Emanuel said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tim Devaney is a national reporter who covers business and international trade for The Washington Times. Previously, he worked for the Detroit News, Grand Rapids Press, Portland Press Herald and Bangor Daily News. Tim can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Dysfunction, disarray at Homeland Security management cited in IG's report
- GM's Barra to be first woman to run top American carmaker
- Treasury sells last shares in 'Government Motors'
- U.S. businesses reach out quickly to partners in Iran
- General Motors ending Chevrolet sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
Latest Blog Entries
David Eldridge joined The Washington Times in 1999 and over the next seven years helped lead the paper’s coverage of regional politics and government, Sept. 11, and the sniper attacks of 2002. In 2006, he was named managing editor of the paper’s Web site. He came to The Times from the Telegraph in North Platte, Neb., where he served as ...
- John McCain, in Kiev, tells protesters that Ukraine is 'inspiring the world'
- Sens. Klobuchar, Collins predict a deal by Thursday
- Rand Paul: GOP can't accept Democrats' attempts to undo sequesters
- Lew says health exchange rollout glitches typical for new software
- John Boehner, Ted Cruz: Upcoming debt-ceiling vote will have conditions
Latest Blog Entries
- Mainers would rather move to Canada than down South
- McCain: 'Stand your ground' laws may need review
- Sen. Tom Coburn: Holder investigating himself is a 'total conflict of interest'
- CNN poll: IRS, AP and Benghazi haven't dinged Obama's approval rating
- Slain diplomat's mom on Obama's Benghazi comments: 'Bullfeathers'
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Sen. Max Baucus: Obamas choice for China ambassador
- Obama's own panel rips NSA spying on phone calls of Americans
- President gets budget win -- but only by staying out of negotiations
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Right-brain investing in a left-brain world. You can do it. I can help.
News and views on the Civil War.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow