- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
LAMBRO: Obama’s election-buying binge
President floods key states with taxpayer dollars
It should be well known by now that President Obama holds the all-time, blockbuster records on federal spending, budget deficits and debt.
In less than four years, the cost of the government’s annual budget has soared to nearly $4 trillion, exceeding the Treasury’s tax revenue by well over $1 trillion a year. The result: four consecutive years of $1 trillion-plus deficits have piled $5 trillion onto the nation’s debt. That debt is now at $16 trillion and climbing.
No other president in U.S. history has spent as much or run up budget deficits as large. No president has plunged our country into as much debt, which threatens to engulf our fragile economy and its future solvency.
Did you know a large chunk of this spending is being doled out by Mr. Obama to buy his way into a second term? Did you know the White House has been tapping into the federal spending pipeline — as if it were his own campaign checkbook — handing out your money in key battleground states that will decide this election?
One of the biggest beneficiaries of Mr. Obama’s largesse is Ohio, a critically important state that likely will decide who the next president will be. Mr. Obama is running ahead there right now, but he was targeting this state many months ago with generous budget handouts that are now being promoted at re-election time.
In March, Mr. Obama pledged to establish up to 15 major manufacturing centers across the country. Not surprisingly, the first state to receive a federal grant and tax giveaways was Ohio — a state that his campaign has made his No. 1 re-election target.
“When the Obama administration awarded tax credits to promote clean energy, the $125 million taken home by Ohio companies was nearly four times the average that went to other states,” The Washington Post reported this week.
“And when a Cleveland dairy owner wanted to make more ricotta cheese, he won what was then the largest loan in the history of the Small Business Administration,” the newspaper said.
There is something very wrong about the spectacle of the president doling out our tax dollars to special interests to benefit his campaign. Your tax dollars. Money that might have made a difference in the lives of tens of millions of Americans, if they had been allowed to keep more of it to pay their mortgage, send their children to college or just to put food on their table.
Mr. Obama is always talking about the importance of a “level playing field” in our economy so that everyone has “a fair shot.” Yeah, sure. But not in presidential elections. He has control of the money we send to Washington, and he’ll use it in any way that benefits his campaign. He’s not shy about saying how much this benefits him politically.
“One of the tastiest investments the government has ever made,” Mr. Obama joked during a campaign visit to Ohio when he pointed to the Cleveland dairy and other favored businesses his administration helped in the state.
However, the $1.1 trillion budget deficit he is running up this year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, is no joke. It is plunging our economy ever more deeply into unfathomable debt that further threatens our nation’s credit rating, which has already been lowered a notch under his presidency.
Worse, it is burying future generations under a mountain of debt that will have to be paid back in the form of higher taxes, fewer economic opportunities and weaker job growth than we have now.
Political apologists for Mr. Obama’s campaign say this kind of federal spending during a campaign cycle is perfectly legal and a common political practice in every presidential election.
Not at the greedy, oversized levels that Mr. Obama and his political gang have raised it to in this election. The Small Business Administration approved 2,726 loans for Ohio businesses this year, an astonishing number for a single state. “That is nearly 500 more [loans] than Florida, a state with 7.3 million more people,” The Post pointed out.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
Get Breaking Alerts
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Hillary Clinton campaign received funds from Jeffrey Thompson
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- Redskins bypass big splash - for now - as free agency period begins
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- Sharyl Attkisson resigns from CBS after months of talks
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama delivering on 'flexibility' vow to Moscow
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama should've seen Ukraine coming
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Political correctness is enemy of free speech
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Stop wasting money on United Nations
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Certain issues belong to voters