- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Minnesota to vote on gay-marriage ban
Question of the Day
Even if it is defeated, Minnesota’s gay-marriage amendment won’t help same-sex couples in the state to wed — rather, it will merely stop the ban from being added to the state’s constitution, leaving in place a law defining marriage as the union of a man and a woman.
Despite this, more than $10 million has been raised by gay-marriage supporters and opponents in what may be Minnesota’s most expensive ballot issue to date.
A recent poll from the Minneapolis Star-Tribune found a near dead heat among voters, with 47 percent opposed to the amendment, 49 percent in favor, and 4 percent undecided. The polling deadlock sets the stage for a tight contest that exposes what some say may be softening views on whether government should control who can and should be allowed to legally wed.
“The fact that it is close is, to me, surprising,” observes Larry Jacobs, a political scientist who directs the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota. “While Minnesota is economically liberal-leaning, it has long been a conservative social state.”
Although the state has many large evangelical Christian churches and was among the states where the right-to-life movement was birthed four decades ago, generational changes, he said, may explain an emerging shift in attitudes.
“As we are seeing all over the country, there is very strong support for tolerance toward sexuality and to gay marriage among young people. In Minnesota, that is very clear,” Mr. Jacobs said. “There has also been a very broad coalition that has come together, including moderate Republicans and businesses.”
Among those are the well-known corporation General Mills, which has stepped up publicly to support a defeat of the marriage amendment. “This is striking and unusual,” Mr. Jacobs adds.
Despite a suggestion that indeed changes in values are occurring in Minnesota, Autumn Leva, a spokeswoman for Minnesota For Marriage, believes plenty of support remains for the measure to pass. Her organization’s polling shows them in the mid-50s, where they expected to be less than six weeks away from the Nov. 6 vote.
“I think [the poll numbers] reflect the fact that a majority of Minnesotans believe that marriage is a union between a man and a woman,” she said. “Kids need a mom and a dad. Men and women are not interchangeable.”
After the state fair ended on Labor Day, her group gained thousands of new supporters who have gone through nearly 75,000 yard signs, she said. Contributions to her cause have “doubled in the last two months,” she added. “Supporters are starting to take a more public role.”
Although Minnesotans are not known for their political rancor, she says many who will vote yes on the amendment are firm in their beliefs.
“The definitions of marriage cannot co-exist,” she argued. “If marriage were to be redefined, this new genderless definition would completely replace the definition of man-woman marriage. Those who still believe in man and woman marriage would be treated as the illegal equivalent of bigots.”
Minnesota for Marriage, the key group backing passage of the amendment, has been vocally supported by many of the state’s Catholic churches. The state’s Catholic bishops have sent out letters of support to 400,000 households asking their congregations to contribute money for television ads to help counter opposition ads currently being broadcast from Minnesotans United for All Families, which has raised more than $8.2 million since 2011.
That figure is nearly three times as much as the gay-marriage opposition and represents 44,000 individual donors with 92 percent of the funding coming from people living inside Minnesota — not from outside groups.
“This is an issue that is not just important to gay and lesbian communities,” said Minnesotans United spokeswoman Kate Brickman. “Our coalition includes more than 650 political groups and businesses from across the state. They see this as a threat to religious freedom. Every Minnesotan can look at our coalition and see themselves represented. We represent all aspects of Minnesota life.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Right-to-work proponents demand justice for violence
- Unions vow to fight Michigan right-to-work law
- Indiana's move pushed Michigan on right-to-work
- Michigan’s governor sides with right to work
- Dems look to Obama to punish Michigan over labor vote
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll - Washington Times#.U9ZSgi7-CXU.twi
- Russia violating 1987 nuclear missile treaty
- RAHN: When money mischief goes global
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq