- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
LAMBRO: Misleading by example
Top Democrats trample truth about Obama’s failures
Question of the Day
He conveniently and dishonestly ignored or papered over all of the painful failures of President Obama’s mediocre performance throughout the past four troubled years. To use a speaking device Mr. Clinton repeatedly applied in his attack on former Gov. Mitt Romney’s candidacy, the number of worsening policy problems that Mr. Obama was responsible for solving totaled “zero.”
The former president, who frequently told Americans “I feel your pain” during his scandal-torn tenure, had little or nothing to say about the severe economic pain that tens of millions of Americans are suffering under Mr. Obama’s failed presidency.
The theme of the Democratic National Convention, as was evident from the sea of signs before the podium, was protecting the middle class, the bedrock of Mr. Obama’s party.
But the economic, fiscal and social statistics that have been relentlessly detailed in government reports over the course of Mr. Obama’s term reveal a jobless, income-starved economy that has hit the middle class the hardest of all. No sector of our population has been punished more by Mr. Obama’s anti-economic growth, anti-job creation policies.
There was no mention of 8.3 percent unemployment, a rate of joblessness across the land that shows no signs of improvement. That’s the average of all the states. Unfortunately, the people this is hurting do not live in the statistically massaged column of averages, but in the real, slow-growth economy Mr. Obama has given us.
“Adding adults on the sidelines, who say they’d re-enter the labor market if conditions improved, and part-time workers, who would prefer full-time positions, the unemployment rate becomes 15 percent,” says University of Maryland business economist Peter Morici.
What else did Mr. Clinton leave out of his carnival-barker defense of Mr. Obama’s presidency? Sharply lower median incomes, higher poverty rates in the 15 percent range, a snail’s pace 1.7 percent economic growth rate that’s on a downward slope, gas prices skirting $4 a gallon, and a big spike in food stamps to combat growing hunger and homelessness in the United States.
Mr. Clinton’s slickly worded speech will be a feast for the fact-checkers, but it was clear that he was cherry-picking numbers and specious facts to make Mr. Obama’s presidency look better than it is. Earlier this week, a Gallup Poll said only 43 percent of Americans approved of the job Mr. Obama was doing, while 48 percent disapproved.
Mr. Clinton threw out a lot of exaggerated job numbers that bear little resemblance to the job-challenged economy that workers are facing today. In the second quarter, the real economy added only 127,000 jobs per month, as income-flattened consumers cut back on their spending to make ends meet.
Like Mr. Obama, Mr. Clinton was tossing out job numbers in the millions, when official job statistics tell a far different story. There are many ways to rejigger the job numbers, and both men are very skillful in using the statistical sleight-of-hand from their bag of tricks. For example: “Over the last 31/2 years, we have focused on righting the ship, making sure that we didn’t slip into a depression creating 4.5 million new jobs,” Mr. Obama has said on the campaign trail.
Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler says Mr. Obama’s claim, “cited many times at the convention is misleading, because it refers to private-sector jobs, not all jobs, and because it is based on a date (February 2010) that put the president’s jobs record in the best possible light.”
Mr. Kessler explains that the real, honest-to-goodness job-growth number “is still negative if you start counting from the beginning of Mr. Obama’s presidency.” That number “is plus or minus a few hundred thousand jobs, depending on whether you date his presidency from January or February,” he writes. Now, here’s the killer:
“At this point, Mr. Obama is on track to have the worst jobs record of any president since World War II,” he says. This is from a newspaper that supported Mr. Obama in 2008 and will likely endorse him again this year.
But this was a convention that was a mass of contradictions and hypocrisy whose slogan this week should have been, “Do as we say, but not as we do.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence