- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
- Israel’s ambassador praises Obama, slams Human Rights Watch report
- Md. parents accused of locking up autistic twin sons
- Dancing Kim Jong-un video sparks North Korea fury
Audit: Taxpayer-funded contracts may have been awarded to Afghan terrorists
Question of the Day
The U.S. government may have awarded taxpayer-funded contracts to terrorists and those who support the insurgency in Afghanistan, according to an audit issued Thursday by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR).
The audit found several weaknesses in DoD’s process to ensure U.S. contracting dollars are not being provided to persons and entities supporting the insurgency, according to SIGAR.
The audit, titled “Contracting with the Enemy,” found that the Defense Department has failed to implement fail-safes aimed at ensuring U.S. funds do not flow to terrorists and other enemies.
Nearly $2 billion in contracts were awarded in 2012 alone, though it is unclear how much of that may have benefited the insurgency.
“The possibility that taxpayer money could be supporting the insurgency is alarming and demands immediate action,” lead inspector John Sopko said in a statement Thursday. “Every effort should be made to implement stronger controls that protect our troops and ensure the success of our reconstruction efforts.”
“DoD has limited assurance that contractors with links to enemy groups are identified and their contracts terminated” despite a law in the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) mandating this take place.
That law only applies to contracts exceeding $100,000. However, roughly 80 percent of contracts awarded in Afghanistan fall below this threshold, according to SIGAR.
The State Department and the American aid group USAID are not required to adhere to this law, known as Section 841.
Some lead contracting officials either did not receive or did not follow a notification issued by U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) identifying supporters of enemy groups, according to SIGAR.
CENTCOM had released four “notification letters identifying five companies and their associates as” suspect individuals who should not be awarded contracts.
SIGAR found “several weaknesses in DoD’s process for implementing Section 841 that prevent the department from having reasonable assurance that U.S. government contracting funds are not being provided to persons and entities supporting the insurgency and opposing U.S. and coalition forces,” according to its report.
“As a result, millions of contracting dollars could be diverted to forces seeking to harm U.S. military and civilian personnel in Afghanistan and derail the multi-billion dollar reconstruction effort.”
Congress allocated more than $16 billion to Afghan security forces and reconstruction projects just last year. This is nearly twice as much as was given to “the next four largest foreign assistance beneficiaries—Israel, Iraq, Pakistan, and Egypt—combined,” SIGAR has noted.
SIGAR additionally found during its investigation that certain contractors were not even told they must adhere to the law barring them from working with the enemy.
Additionally, some lead U.S. contractors did not inform their principals Section 841 even existed.
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
- Obamacare dealt massive setback by federal appeals court
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- Hamas terrorists wear Israeli army uniforms to ambush soldiers in Gaza
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq