- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
$500M Wrigley Field renovation headed for court?
Question of the Day
The Cubs unveiled details Monday of their $500 million plan to renovate the 99-year-old ballpark. It calls for more night games, a new hotel, a new clubhouse, extended beer sales, various upgrades for fans _ and a massive electronic video screen that could spark a legal battle with rooftop owners who have a financial stake in being able to view the games from across the street.
The proposed 6,000-square-foot screen in left field is nearly three times as large as the venerable scoreboard currently atop the centerfield bleachers. Team chairman Tom Ricketts said “significant” advertising-related revenue from the video screen and a 1,000-square-foot sign in right field would be pumped back into the team.
The Cubs say rooftop views would be “largely preserved” and that the sign and screen are “far less than our original desire for seven signs to help offset the cost of ballpark restoration.” Ricketts would not say what the team means when it says the signs would have “minimal impact” on the views from the rooftops. Nor would he discuss the likelihood of a lawsuit, saying only that “we will take that issue as it comes.”
The rub is that the rooftop owners have a contract with the Cubs in which they share revenue from the rooftop seats _ an unusual arrangement, to be sure. The rooftop owners have 11 years remaining on the contract, and they showed no sign of endorsing the big new signs the Cubs want to put up.
“We have a contract with the Chicago Cubs and we intend to see that it’s enforced,” said Beth Murphy, who owns rooftop bleachers and Murphy’s Bleachers, a popular tavern just beyond Wrigley’s centerfield wall. “We have fulfilled our end of the contract, we pay them 17 percent of our gross revenues every year.”
Murphy said the rooftop owners were shut out of negotiations between the city and the team. She said she couldn’t imagine how a 6,000-square-foot sign _ slightly more than a tenth of an acre _ could be installed without disrupting views from the rooftops.
Ricketts said the two sides have a ways to go, that the agreement must be approved by city planners and the City Council. But he said Mayor Rahm Emanuel and the alderman whose ward includes Wrigley Field, Tom Tunney, support the overall plan. The mayor’s office has, in fact, agreed the signs can be installed, but there has been no agreement on size or design.
Only Boston’s Fenway Park is older than Wrigley Field among major league parks. Baseball purists love its intimacy _ the ivy-covered walls, the commitment to day games _ but the team says it spends $15 million a year just to keep up with basic repairs and desperately wants new revenue to pay for new amenities. A better showplace could perhaps help the Cubs snap a World Series championship drought that dates to 1908, six years before Wrigley was built.
Under the plan, the number of night games could be increased from 30 to 40, and construction would include a 175-room hotel, an office building with retail space and health club, and 1,000 “remote” parking spots that would be free and come with shuttle service. Emanuel has hailed the “framework” agreement, noting that it includes no taxpayer funding.
If the deal wins approval from city officials, Ricketts said work could begin after this season ends and be completed over the next five years.
A final deal, when it comes, will end lengthy and sometimes contentious negotiations. The Ricketts family has been pushing for an overhaul of the aging ballpark and ways to bring in more money since buying the Cubs in 2009 for $845 million. Ricketts said the goal was always to keep the Cubs at Wrigley, where he met his future wife.
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- MILLER: Obamacare enrollees include 101 members of the House of Representatives
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Red Alert focuses on the hottest political topics in the nation and calls Americans to action.
History doesn't have to be grim; there is a lot to be learned from the pages of time.
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
White House pets gone wild!