- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Inside the Beltway: Stalwart Americans
Question of the Day
That is the suggested name for free, taxpayer-funded satellite phones for U.S. border residents, says Javier Manjarres, a conservative Florida blogger who uncovered the program after a close reading of the aforementioned immigration reform bill. He believes that illegal immigrants could also get a MarcoPhone, as outlined in section 1107 of the legislation:
“An individual is eligible to receive a grant under this subsection if the individual demonstrates that he or she regularly resides or works in the Southwest Border region [and] is at greater risk of border violence due to the lack of cellular service at his or her residence or business and his or her proximity to the Southern border. Grants awarded under this subsection may be used to purchase satellite telephone communications systems and service that can provide access to 911 service; and are equipped with global positioning.”
PLEASE SHUT UP
“There have been a number of press reports based on information from unofficial sources that has been inaccurate. Since these stories often have unintended consequences, we ask the media, particularly at this early stage of the investigation, to exercise caution and attempt to verify information through appropriate official channels before reporting.”
The FBI’s advice to news organizations following erroneous stories from CNN, The Associated Press and other sources that a suspect had been apprehended in the Boston Marathon terrorist bombings.
These are not happy days for Mark Sanford, the disgraced former South Carolina governor once poised to run as a Republican favorite in the race for the U.S. House seat once held by Sen. Tim Scott. There’s woe along the campaign trail for Mr. Sanford, newly engaged to the Argentine woman who prompted him to divorce his wife Jenny Sanford two years ago.
For one, the National Republican Congressional Committee has also dropped Mr. Sanford from its supportive embrace, even as he debuts a $100,000 attack campaign against Democratic opponent Elizabeth Colbert Busch on local airwaves. The candidate has also been charged with trespassing on his former spouse’s property and has been ordered to appear in court May 9, two days after the upcoming special election.
“It’s an unfortunate reality that divorced couples sometimes have disagreements that spill over into family court. I did indeed watch the second half of the Super Bowl at the beach house with our 14-year-old son because as a father I didn’t think he should watch it alone,” Mr. Sanford explained Wednesday, noting that he’d tried to contact Ms. Sanford, who has had no public comment on the situation.
Meanwhile, the House Majority PAC, a Democratic group, is now on the prowl.
“Mark Sanford may claim to be a fiscal conservative, but as governor he flew around the world in high style, even jetting to the dentist and a hair dresser and stuck South Carolinians with the $400,000 bill,” says spokesman Andy Stone, who says his organization has produced its own attack ad titled “Air Sanford.”
POLL DU JOUR
• 52 percent of Americans say the federal government should “redistribute wealth” through taxes on the rich in the U.S.; 26 percent of Republicans, 34 percent of conservatives, 75 percent of Democrats and 76 percent of liberals agree.
• 45 percent say wealth should not be redistributed; 72 percent of Republicans, 63 percent of conservatives, 22 percent of Democrats and 23 percent of liberals agree.
• 33 percent of Americans overall say distribution of wealth in the U.S. is “fair”; 60 percent of Republicans, 47 percent of conservatives, 14 percent of Democrats and 17 percent of liberals agree.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- The border crisis could prove a 'big boost' for Republicans as the midterms approach
- Inside the Beltway: Just a little media protection for the White House
- Some federal help for old American battlefields: $1.3 million to spruce them up
- Inside the Beltway: Frugal-phobic Congress offers 828 spending bills
- It's grim: 911 Commission warns terrorism has entered 'a new and dangerous phase'
Latest Blog Entries
- A startling 20 percent of Democratic lawmakers already endorse Hillary Clinton for president
- Hey food police: calling obesity a 'disease' is actually a health risk
- Cheese and an 'enhanced experience': White House goes showbiz on the State of the Union address
- Cruz calls it a 'circus': the State of the Union spectacle begins
- Half of American fans say God and 'supernatural' forces are in play during sports events
TWT Video Picks
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of politicizing business
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq