- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Postal Service worried by ‘unsustainable path’
With agency hemorrhaging funds, officials bring concerns to Capitol Hill
Question of the Day
As the agency teeters on the brink of insolvency, leaders of the U.S. Postal Service on Wednesday once again took their pleas for help to Capitol Hill.
The USPS lost $1.3 billion in just the past quarter, and officials say they’re counting on this year’s Christmas mailing season to keep the iconic letter-carrying service afloat.
“This imbalance [between revenues and expenses] will only get worse over the coming decade unless laws that govern the Postal Service are changed,” Postmaster General Patrick R. Donahoe told the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
“We are losing $25 million a day and we are on an unsustainable path. Our financial problems are due to the fact that we have restrictive laws that prevent us from fully responding” to its indebtedness, he said.
Wednesday’s hearing came just a week after the Postal Service abandoned plans to cut regular Saturday mail delivery, a key part of the agency’s long-term strategy to avoid bankruptcy. The USPS Board of Governors abruptly changed course last week after deciding that, under the current continuing resolution funding the federal government, the move to five days a week would be illegal.
The provision in question was first written in 1983, and has been repeated in budgets and continuing resolutions ever since. In very plain language, it directs the USPS to maintain service six days a week.
Postal Service officials clearly believe they would’ve opened the agency up to lawsuits had they gone forward with their proposal. They want Congress to pass legislation making it clear the USPS can cut a delivery day as part of a larger reform package.
But some members of Congress believe the Postal Service simply caved to political pressure to keep Saturday mail, and that legal opinions weren’t truly behind the decision.
Rep. Darrell E. Issa, California Republican and chairman of the oversight committee, suggested that labor unions helped sink the proposed change, a charge he first made immediately after last week’s decision and one he reiterated at Wednesday’s nearly four-hour hearing.
“The union wanted to keep six-day” delivery, Mr. Issa said.
USPS officials acknowledged that it certainly would have been hit with lawsuits had the agency cut Saturday delivery, though it’s unclear how such cases would have turned out.
While the nation’s postal unions have opposed the elimination of Saturday delivery, one of those labor groups conceded Wednesday it will accept other cost-cutting measures, such as personnel reductions, provided the USPS looks to grow its business and compete in the marketplace.
“We’ve done our part to preserve the viability of the Postal Service through the bargaining process. But more must be done and we need the Congress to do its part as well,” said Fredric V. Rolando, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers.
“We’re very supportive of whatever size workforce it takes for the Post Office to have a plan for growth,” he added.
Some prominent Democrats, traditionally allied with labor groups such as the letter carriers, want to see Mr. Rolando and other union representatives follow those words with actions, rather than oppose any job cuts and put the USPS‘ very survival at risk.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Libya now nation at risk with weak U.S. influence
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- White House adviser on 2016: Rand Paul more viable than Ted Cruz
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- DCCC raising money on suggestion Obama impeachment is imminent
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq