- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Drone battles over America a possibility in the future, Sen. Dianne Feinstein says
Question of the Day
As the global drone boom unfolds in the next few years, one key lawmaker warns we could eventually see science-fiction style warfare in American skies.
“I can envision drone fights in the air, drones cracking into each other,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, during a Senate subcommittee hearing on the Federal Aviation Administration’s fiscal 2014 budget.
Although Mrs. Feinstein isn’t the only one with such concerns, FAA officials have on several occasions reassured the public that it would be illegal to operate an armed drone in U.S. airspace. It is illegal for civilians to arm the helicopter or fixed-wing aircraft they own or operate, though every military in the world already does this.
But with technology racing ahead, Mrs. Feinstein fears drone pilots could disregard the law and use the crafts to deliver weapons — and that the federal government will be ill-equipped to stop them.
“It doesn’t take much to put munitions on [a drone], once you’ve got the know-how,” she said.
Weapons aren’t the most pressing issue facing the FAA when it comes to drones. The agency has been charged with the daunting task of integrating the craft into the national airspace no later than Sept. 30, 2015.
Maintaining safe skies, free from drones crashing into traditional aircraft or into each other, is the FAA’s chief goal and responsibility.
FAA Administrator Michael P. Huerta told the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on transportation Thursday that the public has yet to fully grasp what drones are capable of, or the unique challenges they pose for federal regulators and lawmakers.
“It’s fair to say the public is only now coming to grips with what the full implications [of drone integration] are,” he said. “I have stressed to industry associations the importance of them being very transparent. … We as a country need to look at this technology very carefully.”
Mr. Huerta also admitted that the FAA itself is still learning about drones. The agency has established a test-site program, where the craft will be studied extensively to see how they respond at different altitudes, in varying climates and in other conditions.
The data gathered at the six locations across the country, which have yet to be chosen, will be central to new regulations and safety standards governing drones.
But local and state governments, along with a growing number of federal lawmakers, are tackling another key concern of domestic drone expansion — the effect on personal privacy.
More than 30 states have considered bills to limit what the crafts can do, where they can fly and what kinds of data they can collect.
Florida Gov. Rick Scott, a Republican, earlier this week signed a bill outlining how law enforcement agencies can use drones, limiting them to “imminent danger to life” or “serious damage to property” only.
The FAA has released its own privacy protocol to be implemented at its test sites, but the agency lacks the authority to address drones’ snooping ability on a larger scale.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- White House adviser on 2016: Rand Paul more viable than Ted Cruz
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Obama urges Congress to close corporate tax loopholes
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Steve King
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- U.S. evacuates embassy in Libya amid violent clashes between militias
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Obama: U.S. should 'embrace an economic patriotism that says we rise or fall together'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq