- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
TYRRELL: Fanaticism and violence on the left
Boston bombing evokes work of forerunners to terrorist era
Question of the Day
When asked on left-leaning MSNBC why President Obama refrained from describing the Boston bombings as a “terrorist attack,” David Axelrod, Mr. Obama’s longtime political adviser, readily saw a political opportunity. The blood had not been washed away from the streets. We had yet to count the casualties. Yet Mr. Axelrod saw a political opening, an opportunity to advance one or another of his pet political issues. So he said, “I’m sure what was going through the president’s mind is we really don’t know who did this it was Tax Day.” Yes, Tax Day.
This is not the response of a normal mind. A normal mind would not, given the promiscuity of public bombings in the Middle East and now another bombing here in America, think it was provoked by “Tax Day.” Conceivably, the bombs in Boston were the work of small-government libertarians or of Tea Partyers. They could even be the work of vegetarians, but that was not the question. Mr. Axelrod was asked why the president was not describing the bombings as a terrorist attack. It certainly looked more like the work of terrorists either left-wing lunatics or right-wing lunatics than tax protesters.
The politicking continued. On CNN, Barney Frank, the former congressman from Massachusetts, when asked about the bombing, averred: “I never was as a member of Congress one of the cheerleaders for less government, lower taxes. No tax cut would have helped us deal with this or will help us recover.” So Mr. Frank’s response to the bombs in Boston was to favor a tax increase. While he was at it, why not throw in same-sex marriage?
We have a word for the kind of mind that keeps advancing pet political goals even when tragedy is in the air. It is “fanatic.” Truth be known, an awful lot of politicians on the left are fanatics. Sure, we have fanatics on the right, but they usually are widely recognized. The fanatics on the left are more numerous and frequently are palmed off as presidential advisers, viz. Mr. Axelrod, or elder statesmen, viz. Mr. Frank.
Whoever committed the cowardly and despicable carnage in Boston was, in fact, a terrorist. The bombing itself was an act of terrorism. In its very savagery apparently designed to amputate limbs as well as to kill it causes me to pause in my opposition to capital punishment. Caught in the horror of the moment, Americans perhaps despair that such acts have hit a new low. Yet I am afraid this is not the case. What happened in Boston on Monday has been going on for centuries.
There was terrible violence in the draft riots of the Civil War. There was more at the end of the 19th century with the labor unrest of the Wobblies and other radical union organizers. The Pullman strike and the Haymarket Riot in Chicago come to mind. I happen to have a connection to the Haymarket Riot: My great-grandfather Frank Tyrrell was for many years the sole survivor of the Chicago police force that opposed the labor radicals when some fiend set off a bomb in the crowd. As a small boy, I was photographed by one of the Chicago newspapers putting a wreath on the police memorial. The Haymarket memorial itself was bombed twice during an outburst of violence by radicals of the Students for a Democratic Society, at large in the 1960s and 1970s. They were enraptured by some nebulous vision of utopia and resorted to bombs, killings, all manner of criminality and, yes, gun violence to further their cause. By the way, who was prominent among the SDS bombers of the Haymarket memorial? Why, Bill Ayers, the president’s Chicago friend and widely rumored ghostwriter of his best-selling autobiography.
Mr. Ayers, of course, went on to have a distinguished career as a professor of education in some of the most forward-looking projects in our nation and became a respected public figure in Chicago, though he did dedicate a book in 1973 to among others Sirhan B. Sirhan, the 1968 assassin of Robert F. Kennedy. Some have called it America’s first terrorist act. Now we have another.
Doubtless, Mr. Ayers today favors gun control and all manner of reform on our president’s agenda. Making sense out of modern America is a real challenge at times, especially when we are dealing with the left. At least we have prohibited the private sale of explosives for personal protection and sport. Though I will bet you Mr. Ayers could tell you how to lay hands on some.
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is editor in chief of the American Spectator and adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Get Breaking Alerts
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Chris Matthews: GOP less patriotic than South African white apartheid leaders
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'Economic Freedom Zones' for Detroit