- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
Sanctions having effect, but Tehran policy unchanged
Strike or no strike: Debate rages on Iran’s nuclear sites
Question of the Day
International sanctions are squeezing Iran’s economy but are doing little to dissuade the regime’s nuclear ambitions, the top U.S. intelligence officer told Congress on Thursday.
“It’s having a tremendous impact on their economy, by any measure,” National Director of Intelligence James R. Clapper said of the sanctions in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. “That said, it has not yet induced a change in their policy.”
However, U.S. intelligence continues to hold that Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei has not decided to build a nuclear weapon, Mr. Clapper said.
Against the backdrop of nuclear threats from North Korea, some foreign policy mavens say the U.S. can’t afford to wait until Iran has the capability and are urging a pre-emptive, limited military strike.
“It’s going to be a dangerous operation for whoever undertakes it, and it’s not going to be an end to the Iranian nuclear program [but] a delay might be better than what comes next, which is an Iranian nuclear capability, intimidation of the region, possible use of the weapon, possible proliferation,” Danielle Pletka, vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, said Wednesday at a debate hosted by the McCain Institute for International Leadership in Washington.
Arguing alongside Ms. Pletka, Robert Wexler, president of the S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace, said the current U.S. policy of negotiations and sanctions are not working, and predicted that President Obama’s legacy will be defined by the question: “On his watch, did Iran become a nuclear weapon-holder or not?”
Opponents of a pre-emptive strike argued that the president’s dual track of negotiations and sanctions are working, albeit slowly.
“Of course they’re going for a bomb,” said James Dobbins, a retired diplomat who heads international and security policy for the defense firm Rand Corp. “[But] they’ve been careful not to cross that threshold although they’re inching up to it.”
“Time is not working on our side, but I think we have time now,” said Thomas R. Pickering, a retired diplomat who argued alongside Mr. Dobbins at Wednesday’s debate. “Are we ready yet for a third ground war in the Middle East?”
“We are not good at changing regimes. [Iraq] went to hell in a handbasket,” Mr. Pickering said. “Regime change in Iran will require occupation. It’s not a kind of slot-machine issue, in which we put the quarter in, and pull the lever and out comes our preferred alternative.”
The West and Israel have long suspected that Iran’s nuclear program is geared toward creating an atomic weapon, but Iranian leaders have insisted their program is peaceful, designed for energy production and medical research.
Meanwhile, Iran has enriched its uranium to approach weapons-grade quality and has refused to allow international inspectors to examine its nuclear facilities.
“I would hope and suspect that this time we would be more accurate,” he said, referring to the U.S.-led war in Iraq that did not uncover any weapons of mass destruction.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- PRUDEN: The Democratic-wannabe mice under Hillary Clinton's feet
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Norway expects imminent 'concrete threat' from ISIL terrorists 'within days'
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq