- George Bush consoles embattled Alabama kicker Cade Foster: You will be stronger
- Megachurch pastor with ties to Obama commits suicide
- WaPo to readers: Send us your ‘gun violence’ stories for Sandy Hook anniversary
- U.S. threatens Ukraine with sanctions over dispatch of riot police
- Canada doing away with door-to-door mail delivery by 2018
- NSA chief defends phone spying: ‘There is no other way’
- Hawaii Health Department head killed in plane crash
- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl’s hand
- Australia court strikes down 5-day-old, gay-marriage law
- Fake interpreter at Mandela service: ‘Sorry,’ I have schizophrenia
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Signing arms treaty would bind U.S.
Question of the Day
Thomas Howell Jr.’s article “Gun groups promise fight as U.N. inches toward override of Second Amendment” (Web, Thursday) was informative but missing a key point: the Obama administration’s strategy to circumvent Congress. The administration has stated it would sign a treaty on international arms sales if the agreement were a consensus document. “Consensus” does not mean universal agreement, but that no participant has substantive objections to any of the provisions.
A bit of creative vagueness in drafting can resolve objectionable provisions, enabling each nation to apply its own interpretation. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties states, “The consent of a State to be bound by a treaty is expressed by the signature of its representative.” President Obama may authorize signature of the treaty by his designated representative without congressional approval. Once signed, a government is obligated “to refrain from acts which would defeat the object and purpose of a treaty,” thereby binding the United States to the treaty without Senate advice or consent to ratification.
Finally, Mr. Howell’s article quotes anti-gun rights activist Darryl Kimball as stating the treaty would not prohibit “hunting rifles.” Thus, through U.S. signature of the treaty, anti-gun groups could achieve the ban on so-called assault rifles sought by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, but not supported by Congress.
W. HAYS PARKS
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
Get Breaking Alerts
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Washington Post to readers: Send us your gun violence stories for Sandy Hook anniversary
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- Study IDs reasons for late-term abortions
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl's hand
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets