- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
Protected Utah prairie dogs fight for home on the range
For years, residents of Cedar City, Utah, have been waging a losing battle against an infestation of prairie dogs, mainly because the critters have better attorneys.
The Utah prairie dog isn’t exactly on the brink of extinction the state is home to an estimated 40,000 but the rodent is protected under the Endangered Species Act. Unfettered by pest-control efforts, the prairie dogs have dug up a cemetery, an airport landing strip, a golf course and untold hundreds of lawns.
Fed up, Cedar City property owners are taking their case to court. The Pacific Legal Foundation filed a lawsuit last week against the Interior Department challenging federal regulations that restrict removal of the prairie dogs.
“The prairie dogs are kind of hated right now, and it shouldn’t be that way,” said Derek Morton, spokesman for People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners, a local organization riffing off the name of a well-known animal rights group. “We know they play a role in the ecosystem, but because the federal government has failed to take action, they’re causing a lot of angst.”
“The town has been inundated with prairie dogs that are leaving parks, gardens, vacant lots, the golf course, and even the local cemetery, pockmarked with burrows and tunnels,” Mr. Wood said in a statement. “Development projects are blocked by federal prairie dog protections. And public health is imperiled because prairie dogs which are rodents, after all can be carriers of disease.”
The Utah prairie dog, one of five U.S. prairie dog species, numbered just 3,300 when it was listed as endangered in 1973. The Fish and Wildlife Service reduced its status to threatened in 1984, but the rodent’s numbers have exploded since then in Iron County with no movement on the regulatory end.
One problem is that the prairie dog has taken a shine to suburban life. Before it can be delisted, the varmint must meet certain population goals on federal land, but the sociable creatures prefer the manicured lawns and golf courses of suburbia to the untamed wilderness.
Federal biologists have attempted to relocate thousands to nearby public land, while the locals have moved to exhaust nonlethal remedies by erecting fences around the airport and cemetery.
So far, the 3-pound rodents aren’t cooperating.
“They thrive in our subdivisions because there are no predators,” Mr. Morton said. “You can’t blame the prairie dog it’s doing what nature expects it to do. But Fish and Wildlife says there’s no legal framework to move them off private land.”
Indeed, anyone convicted of killing a prairie dog faces a five-year jail sentence and fines up to $40,000. “We’d have better luck robbing a bank in terms of getting mercy from the court,” Mr. Morton said.
Taylor Jones, an endangered-species advocate for WildEarth Guardians, said the group supports nonlethal mitigation efforts, but worries about the potential for overkill if local authorities are placed in charge of managing the critters.
“I wouldn’t call it an infestation,” Ms. Jones said. “The prairie dogs were there first, and inhabited the Great Plains long before any city was built up. That’s their ancestral home.”
The property owners argue in their lawsuit that the federal government has overstepped its authority by attempting to manage the Utah prairie dog. Found in only one state, the species has no value in interstate commerce, which means it falls outside the federal government’s reach under the Commerce Clause, according to the filing.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Six Senate seats could hinge on Keystone pipeline
- Stars not aligned with polls on Keystone
- Former Greenpeace insider Patrick Moore who questions climate change says he can stand the heat
- Pot shot: GOP candidates see hit to Colorado's image from legal weed
- Arizona veto likely to chill other religious freedom bills
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- Redskins bypass big splash - for now - as free agency period begins
- Hillary Clinton campaign received funds from Jeffrey Thompson
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- Atheists sue to remove 'Ground Zero Cross' from 9/11 museum
- Sharyl Attkisson resigns from CBS after months of talks
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again