- Country singer Tim McGraw not sorry for slapping female fan: ‘Things happen’
- Iraq vet cited for owning 14 therapeutic pet ducks
- White House takes credit for drop in unaccompanied children at border
- International crises be damned, Obama’s fundraising trip must go on
- Friend of bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev found guilty of impeding probe
- Train with MH17 plane crash bodies leaves rebel town in Ukraine
- Half of Colorado voters are OK with Hobby Lobby decision, poll shows
- HIV-killing condom to soon hit shelves in Australia
- Estonia pulls plug on Steven Seagal over praise for Putin
- Lawyer: Pelvic exam pics cost Hopkins $190 million
Bush’s Millennium Challenge is still changing the developing world
Question of the Day
It was far from his most expensive initiative, but it may end up being one of his most significant: The Millennium Challenge Corp., which President George W. Bush set up to push foreign countries to better govern themselves, has set a new standard for foreign aid.
As Mr. Bush dedicated his presidential center in Dallas on Thursday, polls show Americans are increasingly positive about his legacy — but for many in the international aid and development community, the former president’s imprint never needed rehabilitation.
His efforts to bolster AIDS-fighting programs in Africa have won strong reviews, and a 2009 report calculated that his efforts saved 1.1 million lives in Africa.
The Millennium Challenge Corp. is not as flashy, but it has gone a long way toward rewriting how foreign aid is conducted and evaluated.
Along the way, it has helped remove the dirty-word connotation foreign aid held for many Americans — particularly some in the Republican Party — who felt the money went to enrich corrupt leaders rather than aid the needy.
“People that have had a dim view of foreign assistance now look at it and say, ‘Well here’s something that works,’” said former Rep. Jim Kolbe, who used to run the spending subcommittee that funded the program. “We’re providing assistance to countries where there is the structure in place, the political structure, the government structure in place, the commitment to development that will make the dollars go to the purpose that’s intended.”
Mr. Bush announced his goal of changing foreign aid in a 2002 speech at the Inter-American Development Bank, where he called for “a new compact” between the rich countries that fund development aid and the poor nations that receive the money.
“Greater contributions from developed nations must be linked to greater responsibility from developing nations,” the president said.
Two years later, the Millennium Challenge Corp. began. It required countries seeking aid to meet goals for good governance and economic policy, and in exchange it guaranteed the U.S. money upfront and pledged that projects would be judged based on their merits, rather than influenced by U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Countries that won grants were required to set up compacts to carry out the projects, and those compacts drew on local expertise.
The Millennium Challenge Corp. publishes a scorecard listing which countries meet the good-governance and economic policy goals. Nine countries were deemed eligible for grants in fiscal 2013.
“The MCC was really one of the pioneers in embracing this model of selectivity,” said Bradley C. Parks, who helped set up the program. “The presumption is fewer aid dollars are going to be wasted if the money is going to well-governed countries, and we’re going to get more development bang for our buck in these countries.”
Some countries have expressed concern about the way the money is divided between low-income and lower-middle-income tranches, which ends up limiting the amount of money that can go to the poorest nations. Early on, some countries complained that the process was unfair and money wasn’t being distributed quickly enough.
The Millennium Challenge Corp. has never been funded to the full level of $5 billion a year that Mr. Bush had hoped, and Mr. Kolbe warned that if funding drops much below its current level, it will be tough to justify keeping it fully staffed. He said he would like to see funding boosted.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- Edward Snowden to work with Russia on anti-spy technology
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- More immigrants deported from New Mexico center
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- Ron Paul: U.S. partly to blame for Malaysia Airlines disaster
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- Pro-Russia rebel commander suggests passengers died days before Malaysian flight
- Vladimir Putin pressured to aid Ukraine plane crash probe, rein in rebels
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq