- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
LAMBRO: Obama’s blood sport with the flying public
The air-traffic control cuts are meant to harass
Question of the Day
Clearly, President Obama is playing a nasty political game with the air-traffic controller furloughs that have forced severe airline delays across the country.
It’s not the first time he’s exploited the budget-cutting sequestration law for political purposes. Earlier this year, he tried to stir up fears that our economy would be hit by fiscal armageddon if the Republican House didn’t submit to his tax-hiking, big-spending demands. His hysterical claims that our food would be unsafe, America’s defenses would crumble, and the elderly would lose their benefits have proven to be groundless.
A headline in Thursday’s edition of The Washington Post states, “Defense firms not yet suffering from budget cuts.” Defense Department contractor General Dynamics, for example, reported its first-quarter sales dipped a little to $7.4 billion, and Northrop Grumman said sales were down slightly to $6.1 billion. The defense industry is doing fine.
The sky is not falling, the government is beginning to see higher revenues, the deficit appears to have shrunk a little, and Social Security checks are going out on time.
But over at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), they’re playing a different game, hitting the flying public and airfreight industry where it hurts the most: lengthy delays that cost time and money.
FAA officials say sequestration cuts have forced them to sharply reduce the number of air-traffic controllers and that they had no other options.
But Republican leaders on Capitol Hill says the White House is playing hardball budget politics with the FAA and the airlines, and that the spending cuts could have fallen elsewhere in the FAA’s vast bureaucracy. “This is a manufactured crisis,” says Sen. Susan M. Collins, Maine Republican, a member of the Appropriations subcommittee that approves funding for the agency.
Sen. John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia Democrat, who chairs the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, and Sen. John Thune of South Dakota, its ranking Republican, shot off an angry letter to the FAA, demanding an accounting of the furloughs and its costs. They were not buying the administration’s explanations that its hands were tied by the sequestration process. “Many stakeholders argue that you have flexibility within your budget to avoid or minimize air-traffic controller furloughs,” they wrote.
In fact, the FAA has some flexibility over where the cuts can fall, but the agency zeroed in on the most critical part of its budget, triggering a political explosion.
High-level officials on Capitol Hill gave me two lengthy legal memoranda that thoroughly analyzed the budget laws governing FAA’s sequestration. Their conclusions: The agency has some flexibility in making its budget cuts and that it has authority to transfer funds from one account to another to ease the impact of sequestration.
There are seven distinct programs under Federal Aviation Administration authority and “the FAA retains discretion — at least as a matter of sequestration law — with respect to how to implement cuts within each of these seven activities, so long as the uniform percentage reduction for the overall activity is achieved,” one memo concluded.
“The statutory requirement of uniformity, in other words, does not restrict the FAA’s choices about how best to reduce spending levels for items within each of the budget activities consistent with its statutory responsibilities,” the memo added.
A second legal analysis provided to me by senior GOP officials cited statutory appropriation laws and rulings from the Office of Management and Budget that furloughs should be considered only “as a last resort.”
Citing the congressional conference report governing federal pay provisions, this memo states: “The conferees urge program managers to employ all other options available to them in order to achieve savings required under a sequestration order and resort to personnel furloughs only if other methods prove insufficient.
“Because furloughs would, as FAA has indicated, impede air-traffic operations and threaten airspace efficiency in a highly intrusive and public manner, the FAA should do all within its power to avoid that disruption with OMB’s priorities,” the memo said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
By Michael P. Orsi
Edward Snowden should declare his patriotism in court
Get Breaking Alerts
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- OBAMASCARE: Huge premium hikes rock employer-insured workers
- UHLER and FERRARA: Obamacare, the end of the progressive era