- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
- U.S., China race to finish line on ‘invisibility cloak’
- Obama ‘cavalier’ in hiding foreign aid order, judge rules
- Prince Charles: Muslims are driving Christians from Mideast through persecution
- Gitmo’s first commander: Close the prison down
- Google’s newest photography find: Just wink and shoot
- Detroit’s Heidelberg art project hit by 8 fires in 8 months
- Pa. police pull people over for random DNA tests for feds
- NASA pushing hard to get back into space game
- Harvard student to face federal charges for bomb hoax
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Misleading background-check data
Question of the Day
I am amazed that the government survey of people in favor of firearms background checks (at a claimed 90 percent) is taken at face value. It was conducted by the “General Social Survey” at the University of Chicago. A key element of this survey is the number of people who own guns which, it claims, is going down.
The director of this program is Tom Smith, who has said that “if we had a larger drop in gun ownership implied in our survey, it would make it easier for politicians to ‘do the right thing’ on guns and pass more restrictive regulations.” Mr. Smith is paid by the anti-gun Joyce Foundation, which expects results for its money.
A benchmark survey taken for gun ownership was 47 percent in 1991. This and subsequent “studies” have been tainted to the degree that distrust of the U.S. government has grown. Prospective respondents noted, “Only a fool would answer ‘yes’ to gun ownership on a survey,” and “I had a survey ask me a question like this a few years back, and I stated ‘no’ when I actually had six guns.” This question is just like asking, “How much money do you make?” Do you think you will get a straight answer?
On top of that, the sample group for the survey was extremely small, only 2,000. It would be very easy to manipulate the results with the composition of the sample group or the wording of the questionnaire.
There is no way that 90 percent of the population is in favor of background checks. As an experienced market researcher, I estimate that it would be about 40 percent. Whatever the real figure is, President Obama is wrong to use it to undercut our nation’s Constitution. Too many Americans have died protecting it.
CARL R. GOODWIN
Colorado Springs, Colo.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
Get Breaking Alerts
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Army to cut up to 4,000 captains and majors
- 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson: Gays 'wont inherit the kingdom of God'
- Prevention of school massacre shoots down arguments for Colorado gun control laws
- Zadzooks: The Joker sixth scale figure review (Sideshow Collectibles)
- CARUSO: Driving off Russian aggression with U.S. natural gas