- Man arrested in car bomb plot at Kansas airport
- Prison inmates take up ‘Knockout’ game, target female officers
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- John Kerry: Israel-Palestinian peace deal paved for April
- India diplomat who touts women’s rights busted for $3 wage to nanny
- MSNBC host Ed Schultz paid $252K by unions in 2012-2013
- Korean War memorial ordered to take down Christian cross
- Billy Graham near death, ‘close to going home to be with the Lord’
- SeaTac, Wash.: City’s new $15 minimum wage heads to court
- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
Obama nominates rail advocate, paves way for more transportation spending
He doesn’t utter discredited terms such as “stimulus” or “shovel-ready” anymore, but President Obama renewed his push Monday for at least $50 billion more in spending on roads and bridges as he introduced his pick for secretary of transportation.
“We want to get people back to work, and we want to get this country moving,” Mr. Obama said in introducing transportation secretary nominee Anthony Foxx, the mayor of Charlotte, N.C. “Congress has to step up, fund these projects.”
It’s a pitch that lawmakers heard often in 2009, when Mr. Obama was advocating his $833 billion economic recovery plan, and they have heard it just about every year since. But government records show that a relatively small slice of the original stimulus package, $47.3 billion, has been spent on transportation projects that the administration said would help turn around the economy. That was less than 6 percent of the overall recovery funds.
An Associated Press analysis in 2011 found that transportation funding from the stimulus had a negligible effect on unemployment. Problems with permits for various construction projects prompted the president to comment at the time, “Shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected.”
The administration’s record under outgoing Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood includes 350,000 miles of roads built or repaired, 20,000 bridges fixed or replaced, and 6,000 miles of rail upgraded. Even so, Mr. Obama is confronting Republican lawmakers who are skeptical of his latest transportation proposals such as high-speed rail, coupled with a lack of reliable funding for the highway bills that do get approval.
Rail projects go off track
Mr. LaHood predicted Monday that high-speed rail networks would be Mr. Obama’s “crowning glory.”
The administration has spent $12 billion on such rail projects with few results, but Mr. LaHood defended the initiative last month. He told CNN that high-speed trains would be in operation “as soon as we can get the kind of work that needs to be done started.”
The president’s proposed fiscal 2014 transportation budget is $76 billion, which would represent a 5.5 percent increase over 2012 levels. In addition, Mr. Obama is calling for $50 billion in stimulus spending, including $40 billion for “fix-it first” projects to upgrade roads, bridges and transit systems. Another $10 billion would be awarded competitively to innovative projects.
Where’s the money?
Emil H. Frankel, a transportation analyst with the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington, said that Mr. Obama deserves credit for recognizing the nation’s transportation needs, but that he failed to offer a credible way to pay for the projects. Among Mr. Obama’s ideas to finance transportation projects is to divert a “peace dividend” from winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which Republicans say is largely an accounting gimmick.
“I have to give the president high marks for talking about transportation and infrastructure and raising consistently the importance of investing in them,” said Mr. Frankel, who served in the George W. Bush administration. “But I don’t think he had really identified what the sources of funding would be. I don’t really see the leadership.”
With lawmakers and presidents reluctant to find new sources of revenue for transportation projects, Mr. Frankel said, Washington is turning increasingly to forms of borrowing such as Mr. Obama’s proposal for a national infrastructure bank. The plan would spend $10 billion to create an independent fund that would leverage private and public capital for infrastructure projects.
“I think that’s important, but I don’t think that’s really sufficient,” Mr. Frankel said.
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster, Pennsylvania Republican, said Mr. Obama’s transportation budget “repeats his call to increase spending without identifying a viable means to pay for it.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Dave Boyer is a White House correspondent for The Washington Times. A native of Allentown, Pa., Boyer worked for the Philadelphia Inquirer from 2002 to 2011 and also has covered Congress for the Times. He is a graduate of Penn State University. Boyer can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Obama and family holiday in Hawaii — again
- White House denies 'highly irresponsible' Iran spy story
- Senate's filibuster rule change opens floodgates for Obama nominees
- White House faces press revolt over access to Obama's South Africa flight
- U.S., Britain to halt non-lethal aid to Syrian opposition
Latest Blog Entries
- White House condemns execution of Kim Jong Un's uncle
- Obamas to observe moment of silence for Sandy Hook shooting victims
- Boehner formally invites Obama for State of the Union address
- White House downplays concerns over phony sign-language interpreter
- Joe Biden signs condolence book for Nelson Mandela at D.C. embassy
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- U.S. Navy-China showdown: Chinese try to halt U.S. cruiser in international waters
- Obama birther theories float as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- Billy Graham near death, close to going home to be with the Lord
- PRUDEN: The last living witnesses; they wore the yellow star and remember the Nazi terror
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- House budget bargain faces Senate filibuster; Republicans line up to oppose
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Dr. Ben Carson disavows efforts at presidential draft
- STEVENS: Resisting the seduction of housing speculation
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Topics will include politics, religion, race, culture, and anything else that needs to be discussed...
Our Choice: Individual responsibility and self-government or the abandonment of the American Revolution
A stat-head’s outlook, direct from his worn in couch cushion.
John Glaser turns his pen toward foreign policy and international relations around the world
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow