- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Obama nominates rail advocate, paves way for more transportation spending
Question of the Day
He doesn’t utter discredited terms such as “stimulus” or “shovel-ready” anymore, but President Obama renewed his push Monday for at least $50 billion more in spending on roads and bridges as he introduced his pick for secretary of transportation.
“We want to get people back to work, and we want to get this country moving,” Mr. Obama said in introducing transportation secretary nominee Anthony Foxx, the mayor of Charlotte, N.C. “Congress has to step up, fund these projects.”
It’s a pitch that lawmakers heard often in 2009, when Mr. Obama was advocating his $833 billion economic recovery plan, and they have heard it just about every year since. But government records show that a relatively small slice of the original stimulus package, $47.3 billion, has been spent on transportation projects that the administration said would help turn around the economy. That was less than 6 percent of the overall recovery funds.
An Associated Press analysis in 2011 found that transportation funding from the stimulus had a negligible effect on unemployment. Problems with permits for various construction projects prompted the president to comment at the time, “Shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected.”
The administration’s record under outgoing Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood includes 350,000 miles of roads built or repaired, 20,000 bridges fixed or replaced, and 6,000 miles of rail upgraded. Even so, Mr. Obama is confronting Republican lawmakers who are skeptical of his latest transportation proposals such as high-speed rail, coupled with a lack of reliable funding for the highway bills that do get approval.
Rail projects go off track
Mr. LaHood predicted Monday that high-speed rail networks would be Mr. Obama’s “crowning glory.”
The administration has spent $12 billion on such rail projects with few results, but Mr. LaHood defended the initiative last month. He told CNN that high-speed trains would be in operation “as soon as we can get the kind of work that needs to be done started.”
The president’s proposed fiscal 2014 transportation budget is $76 billion, which would represent a 5.5 percent increase over 2012 levels. In addition, Mr. Obama is calling for $50 billion in stimulus spending, including $40 billion for “fix-it first” projects to upgrade roads, bridges and transit systems. Another $10 billion would be awarded competitively to innovative projects.
Where’s the money?
Emil H. Frankel, a transportation analyst with the Bipartisan Policy Center in Washington, said that Mr. Obama deserves credit for recognizing the nation’s transportation needs, but that he failed to offer a credible way to pay for the projects. Among Mr. Obama’s ideas to finance transportation projects is to divert a “peace dividend” from winding down the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which Republicans say is largely an accounting gimmick.
“I have to give the president high marks for talking about transportation and infrastructure and raising consistently the importance of investing in them,” said Mr. Frankel, who served in the George W. Bush administration. “But I don’t think he had really identified what the sources of funding would be. I don’t really see the leadership.”
With lawmakers and presidents reluctant to find new sources of revenue for transportation projects, Mr. Frankel said, Washington is turning increasingly to forms of borrowing such as Mr. Obama’s proposal for a national infrastructure bank. The plan would spend $10 billion to create an independent fund that would leverage private and public capital for infrastructure projects.
“I think that’s important, but I don’t think that’s really sufficient,” Mr. Frankel said.
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster, Pennsylvania Republican, said Mr. Obama’s transportation budget “repeats his call to increase spending without identifying a viable means to pay for it.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Dave Boyer is a White House correspondent for The Washington Times. A native of Allentown, Pa., Boyer worked for the Philadelphia Inquirer from 2002 to 2011 and also has covered Congress for the Times. He is a graduate of Penn State University. Boyer can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Obama urges Netanyahu to accept cease fire
- Obama: U.S. should 'embrace an economic patriotism that says we rise or fall together'
- Biden: Blacks have not made enough progress
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Obama raises funds while international crises loom
Latest Blog Entries
- Obama and Boehner congratulate U.S. men's hockey on win over Russia
- Americans say income gap will shrink if government butts out, poll shows
- WH spokesman Jay Carney recognizes beard's 'insufficiency,' shaves it off
- Obama misses deadline again on budget
- Biden burns rubber in driveway, laments road restrictions
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- DCCC raising money on suggestion Obama impeachment is imminent
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq