- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
- CDC sees measles spike and ‘failure to vaccinate’
- Ex-Secret Service agent seeking Md. seat: Everyone’s a ‘de facto criminal’ now
- New prosthetic hand technology lets amputees feel again
- Child killed, 4 injured in Idaho elementary school bus crash
- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on ‘outdated’ agencies
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Pentagon plans to destroy Syrian chemical arms on ship at sea
- Paris Metro issues ‘politeness manual’ to improve passengers’ behavior
- Justin Bieber, crew detained at Australian airport in drug search
HARRIS: We’ll have to wait a while to judge Capitals’ Martin Erat trade
George McPhee, the Capitals' longtime general manager, used the word "guts" when discussing his team's trade-deadline deal that sent prospect Filip Forsberg to the Nashville organization for veteran Martin Erat and prospect Michael Latta.
Yes, you do expect a little bigger return when you deal away someone considered among your best prospects. You don't expect your first responses to be, "Who?" and "What?"
So we'll stipulate the guts part. McPhee has that.
Brains? We'll let you know.
He's either a genius who has been able to oversell or a schlub who got taken in a moment of delusion and mad desire to finally see his team make a real, live run at the Stanley Cup. We may know the answer in a couple of weeks. We may not know for a few years.
In Erat, the Caps are getting a 31-year-old who has played with Nashville for his entire NHL career. Judging from his stats, he looks to be a very good but not great player. If Alex Ovechkin, Nicklas Backstrom and Mike Ribeiro are your "A" level offensive players, slot Erat in at the top of the next level along with the likes of Brooks Laich, Troy Brouwer, Jason Chimera (at least the one we used to know) and maybe Marcus Johansson.
He's had at least 49 points and 16 goals every year since 2003-04. He only has four goals this year, though it is likely an aberration rather than a sign of a drop-off. He's no longer young, but he has some years left.
He's a fine addition and may help. But is he really a tremendous upgrade over what's already there? Wouldn't a tough-as-nails defensive defenseman have been a better addition?
And, most important, does anyone truly feel the Capitals are more of a Stanley Cup threat with Erat than without? Just making the playoffs is a challenge, though the Caps were closing in on the lead in the weak Southeast even before the move. Once in, does anyone with an objective mind see this team getting by Boston again, much less Pittsburgh?
If you're going to give up maybe your best prospect, get someone who moves the needle, someone who makes the hockey world sit up and say, "Uh oh, the Caps mean business." Even if you have to throw in a couple of lesser prospects, like the Nationals did when they acquired Gio Gonzalez.
But therein lies the rub. How good of a prospect did the Caps give up?
Forsberg was taken 11th overall in last year's draft. The website Hockey's Future updated pretty quickly after the trade and already lists Forsberg as Nashville's top prospect based on the scoring system it uses. He's given an 8.0 on their 10-point rating scale, which the site says means "first-line forward/No. 2 defenseman/no. 1 goaltender — players with definite skill that might be just a cut below elite status, but still possessing All-Star potential."
That's pretty good, and too big a price to pay for Erat.
If they're right.
Pierre LeBrun, a veteran and well-respected hockey reporter who now writes for ESPN.com, says the trade could turn into one of those win-win deals.
"And yes, perhaps GM George McPhee could have gotten more had he waited until the summer to shop Forsberg fully to the league," he writes. "You see, I believe the Caps were going to trade Forsberg at some point no matter what, internally souring on the prospect, a player they no longer viewed as a top center in the making."
LeBrun said there were concerns about Forsberg's speed. He wrote he's not so sure this is a bad trade.
"Erat is one of those players that if he were playing in a bigger market all these years would be more of a brand name," he wrote. "Fact is, the Preds just traded their top offensive forward to Washington. And unlike Jarome Iginla or Jaromir Jagr, Erat is not a rental player. He has two more years on his deal ($4.5 million cap hit). The Caps just got a top-six forward for at least two-plus years. Those don't grow on trees. Now, he has to perform, obviously. If he does, we may look back on this deal as not being quite as terrible for Washington as everyone is making it out to be."
Latta, the prospect coming over with Erat, doesn't rank far behind Forsberg with Hockey's Future. He's given a 7.0 (second-line forward/No. 3-4 defenseman/journeyman No. 1 goaltender), one of only five Caps prospects it ranks at that level or higher.
But Latta is just a prospect at this point. Erat is the centerpiece. McPhee said it was unanimous among his scouts to give up Forsberg. He thinks the system is deep enough. He thinks the Caps, having regained their health, took another step forward with Erat.
"I think we've proven that when we're healthy, we're pretty good," McPhee told reporters soon after the trade was announced. "I just tried to make them a little better today."
We'll know soon enough if it works. What we may not know for a while is if it was worth it.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Washington Times sports editor Mike Harris has more than 30 years experience in the business as a reporter, columnist and manager. He’s covered a wide variety of events including two Olympics, horse racing, auto racing, professional and college sports. E-mail him at email@example.com and follow the section on Twitter @WashTimesSports.
- HARRIS: Visions of Robinson Cano under Nationals' tree
- Doing the roster math is a task Caps coach Adam Oates takes seriously
- HARRIS: There's always something you can put on your thankful list
- Martin Erat asks for trade as unproductive Caps stint appears soon to end
- HARRIS: That good or this bad? The true RG3 lies somewhere in the middle
Latest Blog Entries
- Meet Connor Carrick, the youngster who played his way onto the Caps' final roster
- Go Aggies: Nationals notes and lineups for Sept. 14
- RG3: There is no conflict with Redskins coach Mike Shanahan
- Sunday Nats-Dodgers lineups and some thoughts from reliever Craig Stammen
- Nats vs. Dodgers: Chad Tracy and his .149 average back at first base
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Child killed, 4 injured in Idaho elementary school bus crash
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- New battlefront emerges in war between Republicans, tea party
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Obama lived with Uncle Onyango Obama in the 1980s, White House admits
- Blast of winter weather heads to D.C. area
- KNIGHT: Can the ACLU force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions?
- U.S. drops 2,000 mice on Guam by parachute to kill snakes
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Understanding economic events with a free market explanation
John Wood illustrates a new American politics, and the path to get there.
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
White House pets gone wild!