- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama plan could weaken missile defense
As a Navy veteran and chairman of the Veterans Affairs and Emergency Preparedness Committee in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, I have serious concerns about the proposed decrease in our national defense system and military response capabilities ("U.S. joins South Korea in show of force with B-2 bomber," Web, March 28).
After North Korea's latest nuclear test and threat to bury America in a "sea of fire," we should be strengthening our defenses. I believe that forward-deploying B-2s is making progress. However, President Obama proposes to cut our nuclear deterrent in half and his "sequestration" plan could further weaken our missile defense.
Any decrease in our nuclear defense could increase proliferation by forcing allies, such as Japan and South Korea, to pursue building their own nuclear capability. This is because our support has weakened, possibly making the B-2 exercise impossible. This could turn the Asian-Pacific region into a nuclear tinderbox over the most minor territorial disputes.
Cutting funds for missile defense would also leave our West Coast vulnerable. The ground-based midcourse defense network provides our only defense against a North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile. Once politically controversial, Democrats and Republicans now agree we must have a strong ballistic missile safety net.
The Department of Defense has decided to deploy more defensive interceptors to the West Coast, but as North Korea increases its nuclear ICBM capacity we must strengthen our ground-based system against decoys and counter-measures. This capability is also needed on the East Coast to deal with hostile relations with Iran.
While cutting these defenses might shave a fraction off the deficit, it would critically diminish our national security at precisely the wrong moment.
STATE REP. STEPHEN E. BARRAR
Chairman, Pennsylvania Veterans Affairs and Emergency Preparedness Committee
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
Get Breaking Alerts
- Inside the Beltway: A new interest in Rahm Emanuel for 2016?
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Brennan: Russia 'absolutely' could invade eastern Ukraine
- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- White House touts leadership in handling of crisis in Ukraine, despite lack of results
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- Atheists sue to remove 'Ground Zero Cross' from 9/11 museum
- Liam Neeson tells NYC mayor to 'man up' in horse carriage fight
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- FEULNER: Civic involvement, not big government, empowers Americans
- BLACKWELL: Obama fumbles key to saving minority youth
- RAHN: The responsibility to resist fiscally irresponsible politicians
- GANS: Obamacare's latest casualty: rehabilitative hospitals
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama delivering on 'flexibility' vow to Moscow
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama should've seen Ukraine coming
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Political correctness is enemy of free speech
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Stop wasting money on United Nations
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Certain issues belong to voters