- Marionville mayor ‘kind of agreed’ with Kansas City shooter’s views
- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Teen taking selfie by train: ‘Wow, that guy just kicked me in the head’
- Goodbye, Afghanistan — hello, Africa: Air Force to shift as U.S. exits Middle East
- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama plan could weaken missile defense
As a Navy veteran and chairman of the Veterans Affairs and Emergency Preparedness Committee in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, I have serious concerns about the proposed decrease in our national defense system and military response capabilities ("U.S. joins South Korea in show of force with B-2 bomber," Web, March 28).
After North Korea's latest nuclear test and threat to bury America in a "sea of fire," we should be strengthening our defenses. I believe that forward-deploying B-2s is making progress. However, President Obama proposes to cut our nuclear deterrent in half and his "sequestration" plan could further weaken our missile defense.
Any decrease in our nuclear defense could increase proliferation by forcing allies, such as Japan and South Korea, to pursue building their own nuclear capability. This is because our support has weakened, possibly making the B-2 exercise impossible. This could turn the Asian-Pacific region into a nuclear tinderbox over the most minor territorial disputes.
Cutting funds for missile defense would also leave our West Coast vulnerable. The ground-based midcourse defense network provides our only defense against a North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile. Once politically controversial, Democrats and Republicans now agree we must have a strong ballistic missile safety net.
The Department of Defense has decided to deploy more defensive interceptors to the West Coast, but as North Korea increases its nuclear ICBM capacity we must strengthen our ground-based system against decoys and counter-measures. This capability is also needed on the East Coast to deal with hostile relations with Iran.
While cutting these defenses might shave a fraction off the deficit, it would critically diminish our national security at precisely the wrong moment.
STATE REP. STEPHEN E. BARRAR
Chairman, Pennsylvania Veterans Affairs and Emergency Preparedness Committee
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- FISHER: Shades of Berlin in the South China Sea
- HURT: Wilson and Obama ... 100 years apart, but so alike
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- U.S. military on high alert as Ukraine troops trade gunfire with pro-Russian militants
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Muhammad wouldn't condone Boston bombing
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: High heels: Hazardous to one's health?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Marshall's comments hurt GOP, pro-lifers