- ‘Gay Jeans’ that fade into rainbow-colored denim created
- Divided court strikes down big porn award
- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
- L.A. sheriff admits to testing flyover spy program without notifying residents
EDITORIAL: The 5 percent solution
‘Sequestering’ the president’s pay is cute but meaningless
It's not as melodramatic or drastic as going on a hunger strike or chaining himself to the White House fence, but President Obama's "sequestering" 5 percent of his $400,000 salary — or $20,000 — during the period of fiscal restraint is a nice gesture. Several other government officials, including Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan and Sen. Mark Begich of Alaska (a Democrat) are making similar token sacrifices.
It's fair to speculate (politics, like life, is rarely fair) that Mr. Begich, up for re-election in 2014, has his eye on the polls and a prospective Republican challenge from Tea Party favorite Joe Miller. Mr. Obama, of course, is done with running for office, and Mr. Hagel might as well be. So theirs may be sincere gestures, but they're empty ones. Many in the administration — and certainly Mr. Obama and Vice President Joe Biden — could do a lot more to restrain spending. It's a matter of priorities.
The White House is still closed to public tours, disappointing thousands of spring tourists who traveled hundreds or thousands of miles and had hoped to see the "people's house" up close. By foregoing a golfing vacation or two, Mr. Obama could have shifted more than enough money to cover the cost of uniformed and plainclothes Secret Service agents needed to support the tours. If Mr. Biden were to resume his Amtrak-riding ways between Washington and his home in Delaware, or even go home in a motorcade or two, the savings over his million-dollar weekend jet getaways would come to a lot more than the paltry sum needed to pay for the tours.
There will be no sign of austerity at the White House next Tuesday, when the president and Mrs. Obama welcome artists Alabama Shakes, William Bell, Steve Cropper, Al Green, Ben Harper, Queen Latifah, Cyndi Lauper, Joshua Ledet, Sam Moore, Charlie Musselwhite, Mavis Staples and Justin Timberlake for a concert to be televised a week later by PBS. Administration officials helpfully note that this will be the 10th "In Performance at the White House" hosted by the Obamas.
Phone banks might cast a damper on the event, with Cyndi Lauper and Justin Timberlake waiting to croon for pledges, but this would be a great venue for the ubiquitous beg-a-thons of PBS. It's a shame to waste an opportunity for bad taste, with plain taxpayers unable to get past the front gate. It's sad. Mr. Obama rebuffed congressional offers to enable him to make sequestration "cuts" (more accurately, reductions in spending increases) more sensibly. Perhaps the novelty wears off after five years in the executive mansion, but for first-time visitors, perhaps a future resident among them, visiting the White House is a life's highlight.
Mr. Obama's 5 percent solution is about appearing to care, which is different from actually caring. Cutting the salaries of a handful of politicians by 5 percent or less won't do anything when the entire federal government should take a 28 percent cut to restore balance. Until that happens, Mr. Obama will continue to party with celebrities in the people's house. The rest of us are on the way to the poor house.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Former CIA head Gen. Michael Hayden to pen Times column
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Orlando well-suited for DNC
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: President 'mom jeans' vs. Putin
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: House has the power it needs
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Misunderstanding the Second Amendment
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
Get Breaking Alerts
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Kansas will nullify local regulation of guns
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Harry Reid using tax dollars to fight Koch brothers, La. GOP chair charges
- Washington Redskins' 2014 schedule opens with Texans