- Britain’s Labour Party hires David Axelrod — but can’t spell his name
- Washington and Lee law students demand ban on Confederate flag, say Gen. Lee was racist
- Prosecutors seek arrest warrant for ferry captain in South Korea
- Ann Coulter takes up ‘Mitt Romney for President’ chant again
- Mount Everest avalanche kills a dozen Sherpa guides
- Vice principal saved from South Korean sinking ferry found hanged
- ‘I Am Alive’ app gains popularity in terror-ravaged Lebanon
- Gun giveaways gain popularity among Republican candidates
- S.C. hospital worker slapped with $525 federal fine for refilling $0.89 soda
- Teen from ‘Jihad Jane’ plot becomes youngest ever to serve time on U.S. terror charges
PACOM chief says South Korea very likely to respond to North’s aggression
The top U.S. military officer in the Asia Pacific region said Tuesday there is a growing sense in South Korea that “it would almost impossible for the South Koreans not to respond in some fashion” if North Korea were to sink one of their ships or shell an island, as the communist state did in 2010.
“Their toleration of a significant provocation towards the South is much lower than it has been in the past,” Navy Adm. Samuel Locklear III, commander of U.S. Pacific Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee.
The U.S. has signed a mutual defense treaty with South Korea, and would defend the South Korea if it were attacked. The U.S. has 28,500 troops in South Korea to enforce a cease-fire between North and South Korea, who are technically still at war.
Adm. Locklear did not go into detail on what U.S. or South Korean response plans were , but said that if North Korea launched a missile towards South Korea, the U.S. would intercept it.
“What we have in place is the ability for the alliance to have — we’ve planned and thought through some of these events; in fact, a lot of the events,” he said.
“We have the ability to quickly consult with each other and to quickly bring the forces that would be necessary to hopefully — you know, the idea would be to get it under control and to de-escalate it as far as possible so that, I mean, in the end, you know, the best thing we as militaries can do is to preserve the peace, to get it back to peace, so that diplomacy can work. And we would hope that that could be done in North Korea.”
“But it is a very dangerous situation,” the admiral said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Team Obama's bizarre behavior helps Gitmo terrorists foil justice
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- CBO shows it's Paul Ryan 4, Obama 0 on budget targeting
- PRUDEN: When a bored president just 'mails it in'
- Joe Biden's biggest gaffe: VP blowing his 2016 head start
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- With pot and e-cigarettes, Big Tobacco is just waiting to inhale emerging markets
- Golden Hammer: Easter candy bitter taste for taxpayers?
- Obama taunts GOP, takes nationally televised victory lap on Obamacare
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.