- Family removed from Southwest flight over tweet about rude agent, dad says
- Michael Bloomberg thumbs FAA ban, plots course to Israel
- California bans full-contact football practices in off-season
- Thune: Downed fighter jets show more evidence of separatist capabilities
- Obama tells DNC fundraising crowd: ‘I’m not overly partisan’
- Chambliss: Downed jet ultimately goes back to Putin
- Perdue strategy: Run against Reid, Obama, Pelosi
- White House: More changes to contraception mandate coming
- ‘Operation Normandy’ set to send 3,500 volunteers to border to ‘stop an invasion’
- Netanyahu’s spokesman: Safe to fly to Israel
Energy Secretary Moniz leaves dirty work on coal to others
Question of the Day
Since joining the administration about 10 weeks ago, Mr. Moniz — a Massachusetts Institute of Technology scholar who is considered to have one of the nation’s brightest minds on energy issues — has offered an olive branch to the besieged American coal industry, widely viewed as the mortal enemy of a White House bent on drastically reducing carbon emissions and doubling down on investments in renewable fuels such as wind and solar power, at the direct expense of coal.
“There is no war on coal,” Mr. Moniz insisted last week at a breakfast hosted by The Christian Science Monitor. “We start by saying we must control CO2 emissions. So then, after many years of talking the talk the issue is walking the walk in terms of developing the technology to control those emissions.”
Three days earlier, he visited West Virginia, one of the nation’s largest coal-producing states and a state where President Obama is deeply unpopular, and stressed that clean coal will be a part of the nation’s energy portfolio for years to come.
But his words stand in stark contrast to those of other administration officials, and it’s not clear who has the upper hand when it comes to policy.
Last month, White House climate change adviser Daniel Schrag wrote in The New York Times that “a war on coal is exactly what’s needed” as Mr. Obama pursues his ambitious agenda to fight climate change.
Mr. Obama boasted during his 2008 campaign that building a coal-fired power plant would be virtually impossible under his administration. Since he took office, the Environmental Protection Agency has been implementing a host of regulations that carry severe consequences for the coal sector, most notably emissions standards for power plants that are all but impossible for coal-powered plants to achieve with commercially available technology.
Last week, a West Virginia congressional delegation visited the White House to sit down with new EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and voice their concerns that the agency is slowly crushing the coal sector. Sen. Joe Manchin III, West Virginia Democrat, called the meeting “productive” but said deep fear remains among coal-state lawmakers that the regulatory burden will only get worse.
West Virginia Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin, a Democrat, was a late addition to the meeting. He said in a statement afterward that he told the EPA officials that hundreds of his constituents were out of work directly because of the administration’s “overzealous, ideological, and financially devastating policies.”
“What Moniz’s job may be, because he does have credibility as a guy who understands energy, is to go around telling everybody that everything is going to be OK, don’t get too upset” about regulations, said Dan Kish, senior vice president for policy at the conservative Institute for Energy Research. “Frankly, Moniz understands energy. He’s steeped in it. He at least understands energy and the importance of it. He’s not going to go out of his way to punch people in the nose.”
Rather than sounding a hostile note toward coal, Mr. Moniz instead is touting the fuel’s future.
He repeatedly reminded reporters at the Christian Science Monitor breakfast that the Obama administration has invested more than $6 billion into “carbon-capture” research that may allow coal-fired power plants to meet increasingly harsh limits on greenhouse gas emissions.
Much of that technology already has been developed but remains prohibitively expensive for energy companies. The administration’s goal, Mr. Moniz said, isn’t to eliminate coal, but to help make carbon-capture affordable enough for coal to remain in the energy mix.
“The goal of innovation in this business is to drive the cost down,” he said. “Getting the cost down makes policy a lot easier.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- White House: More changes to contraception mandate coming
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Obama takes executive action on LGBT discrimination, but leaves religious loophole
- White House takes credit for drop in unaccompanied children at border
- Foreign crises won't derail Obama's fundraising trip, White House says
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Retailer pays a price for getting too close to Obama
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- Two Ukrainian fighter jets shot down
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- HURT: The cost of 'free' water in Detroit
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq