- Big milestone for Britain’s little Prince George who turns 1
- Murphy: Israel must be wary of Hamas using civilian deaths for recruitment
- Royce: Putin recruiting ‘every skinhead and malcontent around Russia’
- Nancy Pelosi is adamant: Congress worked together when Bush was president
- ‘Slender Man’ stabbing victim receives Purple Heart from anonymous veteran
- Kentucky city called socialist for buying gas station, undercutting competitor fuel prices
- Israel hits five mosques, sports complex in overnight Gaza strikes
- Hillary Clinton dogged for refusing reporters’ questions on book tour
- EPA tweet baffles: ‘I’m now a C-List celebrity in Kim Kardashian: Hollywood’ iPhone game
- Australian P.M. Abbott: MH17 evidence tampered with on ‘industrial scale’
TYRRELL: Fables from Terry McAuliffe’s gifted imagination
An accomplished fibber has brought his stories to the Old Dominion
Question of the Day
It is called the Taranto Principle, having been named after he who coined the principle, the inimitable James Taranto of The Wall Street Journal. According to the Taranto Principle, the left-wing media, in their fawning treatment of left-wing politicians, only encourage the pols' worst instincts — encouraging Jean-Francois Kerry's sophomoric windsurfing during his presidential race or Howard Dean's blood-curdling scream upon losing the Iowa caucuses.
Then there is President Obama. At his news conference the other day, he finally commented on the traitor Edward Snowden. Mr. Obama said, "You know, if I had a son, he'd look like Edward." OK — I made that up, but who doubts that he is capable of such excesses? Mr. Obama might say anything, and the left-wing press will generously indulge him, thus encouraging him to ever-greater pratfalls.
I thought of the Taranto Principle while reading Fred Barnes' commentary the other day on the governor's race in Virginia. Mr. Barnes says, "Negative campaigning is common in American elections, but Democrats in this year's high-stakes race for governor of Virginia have taken things to the next level." The Democrats accuse the Republican candidate, Ken Cuccinelli, of saying things that he manifestly has never said. They accuse him of writing it all down in a book, but when fact-checkers checked the book, the Democrats' charges dissolved in a haze of lies.
I am not surprised. The Democratic candidate for governor is none other than my old friend, Terry McAuliffe. At least I think he is a friend. He calls me "Bob," and I call him "Terry" in a warm correspondence that is as evasive on his part as the campaign Democrats are now waging against Mr. Cuccinelli. They cite Mr. Cuccinelli's book, "The Last Line of Defense," as saying things that he clearly has not said. Terry did exactly that with me, citing scurrilities in my magazine, the American Spectator, that did not appear there. Terry is a bold-faced liar and, apparently, those in the Democratic Party who compose his ads are, too. Why do they go to such extremes? I suggest the Taranto Principle. They are encouraged by their boosters in the media.
In his "memoir," "What A Party!" Terry writes, among other howlers, that the American Spectator, "cooked up the nonsense they put out against [Bill] Clinton, alleging that he'd ordered the murder of political opponents ." I wrote Terry, asking where in the magazine I might find such allegations — no response. A month later, I encountered him joshing it up in the Green Room of MSNBC with a comely makeup artist, and politely asked him yet again where I might find such shocking charges in a magazine, which, by the way, I edit. He promised to get back to me, but did not until I wrote him another letter of encouragement. That commenced a long and somewhat intimate correspondence, in which he congratulated himself on his literary skills, mentioned his Irish heritage, lectured me on the proper construction of a paragraph and even of a sentence, but never offered a scintilla of proof for his charges against the magazine. For the curious, I published the whole amusing exchange in the December 2007-January 2008 issue of the American Spectator.
Mr. Cuccinelli is having the same experience with Mr. McAuliffe. He has authorized a TV ad accusing Mr. Cuccinelli of questioning in his recent book "whether Medicare and Social Security should exist." The ad cites Pages 62 and 63, and, of course, the ad lies. Fact-checkers found that on those two pages, Mr. Cuccinelli merely mentioned that these programs created dependency on government. The fact-checkers went on to note that Mr. Cuccinelli wrote on Pages 237 and 238 that "I'm not questioning here the existence of these programs, nor the wisdom of how much is spent on them." Says Fred Barnes, "The ad was wrong."
Mr. McAuliffe has not apologized. Nor did he pull the ad. Rather, he continued to run it, even though it was proved false. Now Terry is an amusing fellow, but he ought not to be governor of the great state of Virginia. What would Thomas Jefferson say? What would George Washington say? Those ads should have been canceled. Terry should apologize — to Ken Cuccinelli and to me.
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is founder and editor in chief of the American Spectator, and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
Get Breaking Alerts
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- Hillary Clinton dogged for refusing reporters' questions on book tour
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- Hamas terrorists wear Israeli army uniforms to ambush soldiers in Gaza
- U.S. scrambles as violence escalates in Israel-Hamas conflict
- Edward Snowden to work with Russia on anti-spy technology