- Deadly N.Y. train derailment leads to Senate call for cameras at tracks
- WWII vet, 90, en route to Pearl Harbor event booted from flight
- SWAT team at Phoenix hospital as armed man clears emergency room
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle dragged from political meeting, booted from party
- Big storm dumps snow on East Coast, travel dicey
- Thai prime minister dissolves Parliament, calls elections
- Hagel to meet with Pakistan’s prime minister
- Kiev: Riot police deployed near protest sites
- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
- U.N.: Afghanistan slow to enforce law protecting women
ALLARD: Playing checkers on Egypt’s chess board
Obama doesn’t grasp the stakes in the Middle East game
It was only a momentary interruption of his vacation in the oh-so-tony climes of Martha’s Vineyard. As the death toll from Egyptian riots topped 500, President Obama took it upon himself to call for restraint on both sides, neither of which appeared to be listening. The State Department helpfully chimed in that there “was no place” for violence despite the pitched battles taking place between the Egyptian military and Muslim Brotherhood rioters demanding the return of ousted strongman Mohammed Morsi. Mr. Obama further showed his displeasure by suspending the joint U.S.-Egyptian military exercises scheduled for next month, a biennial landmark for both armies.
Although Mr. Obama resolutely claimed impartiality — “We don’t take sides “— critics like former U.N. Ambassador John R. Bolton swiftly charged that Mr. Obama had effectively come down on the side of Mr. Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood, making a bad situation even worse. Far more perplexing for the Obama White House was the criticism leveled by a scathing op-ed in The Washington Post, normally a reliable administration cheerleader: ” the Obama administration is complicit in the new and horrifyingly bloody crackdown launched Wednesday by the de facto regime against tens of thousands of protesters who had camped out in two Cairo squares.”
Equally confounding to allies and adversaries alike, Egypt is simply the latest debacle in the foreign policy of an administration that persists in playing checkers in the multifaceted chess match of international politics. As a result of bungled priorities and missed opportunities, those stakes grow higher every day. Egypt is not only the most populous country in the Arab world, but is also a fulcrum: between Israel and the Arab countries to the east and west, and among the nine African countries (and 200 million people) with which it shares the Nile River valley from south to north. See what I mean about stakes?
Yet from his famous 2009 Cairo speech, “A New Beginning,” Mr. Obama has persistently seen the Arab world through the badly distorted lens of Western idealism. The signal inadvertently sent by his administration — almost from his first inauguration — was that extremists in Egypt and elsewhere could relax. America was now in retreat — militarily, economically and politically. For those and a host of other reasons, the Arab Spring and the rise of Mr. Morsi followed as naturally as night follows day.
For a time, wishful thinking allowed the ugly new realities in Cairo to be camouflaged, hidden away lest anyone think that the admittedly democratic election of Mr. Morsi was a mixed blessing. One of those who had reason to believe otherwise is Raymond Ibrahim, a Coptic Christian and author specializing in Middle East issues. In his recent book, “Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians,” Mr. Ibrahim catalogs the persecution of Christians that Western media typically ignores.
Although his book’s scope is global — and extensively documented — it is especially graphic in its descriptions of Coptic churches throughout Egypt being bombed, burned and destroyed, and of violence against Christians because of their faith. The Maspero Massacre serves as an example — an October 2011 atrocity that killed at least 28 Copts in scenes reminiscent of “Schindler’s List.” Mr. Ibrahim claims that this was simply the Muslim Brotherhood doing precisely what the tenets of Islam required.
To their credit, many Egyptians who were not Copts were outraged as well, dismayed by the growing drift of Egypt under Mr. Morsi, where the trains didn’t run on time even as drought and famine were quickly becoming plagues of biblical dimensions. With Ethiopia diverting Nile waters to its new Renaissance Dam, in May Mr. Morsi convened a meeting to discuss Egyptian options, including various harebrained schemes for military action. To the government’s intense embarrassment, the proceedings were carried live on Egyptian television. Whether resulting from a fateful technical glitch or a fiendish dirty trick, the veil was abruptly torn away from the Morsi government.
Everywhere, that is, except in Washington, where wishful thinking is practically an art form. Small wonder that the Egypt of the masses, the mosque and the military exploded, with some 60 million strong who had simply had enough. Small wonder as well that this strategically vital ally is on the verge of civil war — decent people arrayed against proto-fascists yearning for the comforting customs of the seventh century.
It is a hard reality, but one especially difficult to grasp from Martha’s Vineyard.
Col. Ken Allard, retired from the Army, is a military analyst and author on national security issues.
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
Get Breaking Alerts
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- EDITORIAL: Health care hardball
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- FENNO: Mike Shanahan's empty words no salve to free-falling Redskins
- POWELL: The Fed's scandalous monetary policy
- As the unemployed wait, lawmakers debate about extended benefits
- Sen. Rand Paul: Supreme Court needs to re-examine Fourth Amendment