- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Summer camp for 1 percenters: Sushi, limos and shopping at FAO Schwarz
- Colorado gun crackdown law found to be built on faulty data
- Hank Aaron steps to fundraising plate for Democrat Michelle Nunn
- ISIL terrorists blow up burial site of Jonah, vow more of same
- Impeach Obama, say 35 percent in new poll
- Taliban yank 14 Shiites off bus, bind and shoot them on Afghan road
Paul and King highlight GOP’s great divide on surveillance
Question of the Day
Republicans Rand Paul and Peter T. King sparred Sunday over the National Security Agency’s domestic-surveillance program, illustrating the party’s divide on the federal government’s monitoring of private data in the interest of national security.
Appearing on “Fox News Sunday,”Sen. Paul of Kentucky criticized President Obama for allowing a lack of independent scrutiny over the agency, saying the Supreme Court should examine the constitutionality of NSA data-collection protocols.
“You know, I think that the president fundamentally misunderstands the constitutional powers,” Mr. Paul said. “The checks and balances come from independent branches of government. So he thinks if he gets some lawyers together from the NSA and they do a PowerPoint presentation and they tell him everything is OK, that the NSA can police themselves.”
Rep. King of New York blasted the senator’s comments.
“That was just a grab bag of misinformation and distortion coming from him,” said Mr. King.
A May 2012 audit that was not released to the public found that the NSA committed nearly 3,000 violations of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court rules, according to a Friday report in The Washington Post.
“[Mr. Paul] says there’s billions of phone calls being collected. It’s not even true, but let’s assume he’s being right for once — billions of phone calls being collected. You juxtapose that with 2,800 violations, which were self-reported by the NSA, which do not violate anybody’s rights,” Mr. King said.
Of those 2,800 violations, he said, 1,900 involved noncitizens. “No Americans’ rights were violated with that,” Mr. King said.
“If you have a 99.99 percent batting average, that’s better than most media people do, most politicians do,” Mr. King said. “I have tremendous respect for Gen. [Keith B.] Alexander and the whole NSA. This whole tone of snooping and spying we use … it’s really a smear and a slander of good, patriotic Americans.”
But other lawmakers say the new details about NSA snooping are troubling.
Had the details come to light earlier, last month’s unsuccessful House vote to defund the program might have gone the other way, according to one legislator who was part of the effort.
“We only needed seven votes to switch and I think there were at least seven, probably more like 20 to 30, who had their concerns about the program but were prepared to give the intelligence agencies the benefit of the doubt,” Rep. H. Morgan Griffith, Virginia Republican, told The Washington Times last week after news of the NSA rules violations broke.
Democrats have recently weighed in against the NSA privacy violations. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, said last week that she found media reports on the NSA audit “extremely disturbing.”
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut Democrat, called for a special advocate to serve as a watchdog for constitutional issues.
“The problem — and there is a real problem — is with the system. It is a black box,” Mr. Blumenthal said on “Fox News Sunday.” The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court “is a secret tribunal, issuing secret opinions, making secret law and a lot of it completely unavailable to members even of the foreign intelligence committee.”
“I think [the NSA] got most of the terrorists or stop most of the terrorists, if not all of the plots, by good old-fashioned police work, and getting warrants and getting wiretaps on people who they were suspicious of, whom they ask a judge about,” Mr. Paul said. “And I’m not against that. I’m all for surveillance of spies, I’m just not for this gross bulk gathering of data on all Americans.”
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick J. Leahy, the chamber’s senior lawmaker, has also vowed to hold hearings.
“I remain concerned that we are still not getting straightforward answers from the NSA,” the Vermont Democrat said Friday.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Plagiarism scandal threatens Senate campaign of Montana Democrat John Walsh
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Act would create tax-free savings accounts for the disabled
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- Carson wins straw poll as conservatives focus on winning battle of ideas
Latest Blog Entries
Shaun Waterman is an award-winning reporter for The Washington Times, covering foreign affairs, defense and cybersecurity. He was a senior editor and correspondent for United Press International for nearly a decade, and has covered the Department of Homeland Security since 2003. His reporting on the Sept. 11 Commission and the tortuous process by which some of its recommendations finally became ...
- Senator's memo shows Iran links in Homeland Security's troubled immigration program
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- Dems back bill to fix problems in investor visa program
- Democrats proceed with Mayorkas vote despite pending investigation
- NSA monitored 'World of Warcraft' players
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Crime-ridden U.S. cities differ on ways to fight gun violence
- Obama takes aim at 'corporate deserters'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq