- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
- U.N.: Afghanistan slow to enforce law protecting women
- Heart cancels SeaWorld concert after ‘Blackfish’ documentary
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- South Africans hold day of prayer for Nelson Mandela
- Mandela not on life support in final hours, friend says
- Ukraine protesters topple, decapitate Lenin statue in Kiev
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle removed from North Korean state documentary
- Thailand crisis deepens as opposition quits Parliament
- Campbell Soup apologizes for SpaghettiOs’ Pearl Harbor tweet
LAMBRO: Al Qaeda on the runback
Contrary to the president’s campaign boast, it’s America on the run
It turns out that’s not true and probably never was. The al Qaeda network has grown much larger, and more lethal and dangerous than ever, with expanded franchises in a number of Muslim countries and outposts, which right now are threatening to attack us, according to “intercepted communications” picked up by the National Security Agency.
That’s right, the same National Security Agency that has been irresponsibly attacked by its critics in Congress and elsewhere for its narrowly selected, court-approved use of telecommunications data both here and abroad to protect us from another Sept. 11.
Despite Mr. Obama’s exaggerated, swaggering claims that he had all but destroyed al Qaeda, they are the ones who are on the offensive, targeting embassies, consulates and possibly key targets in the United States. We’re the ones on the defensive, shuttering our posts in foreign capitals across the Middle East and North Africa — more than 20 of them at last count.
The administration wasn’t taking any chances, after the severe political beating it got over its attempted cover-up of terrorist attacks that led to the massacre at our consulate in Benghazi, Libya, where our ambassador and three other Americans died in 2012.
What message does the administration’s latest move send in response to al Qaeda’s latest terrorist threats? They now can shut our embassies down in the Muslim world without firing a shot. It’s especially dangerous at a time when we’re rapidly pulling out of Afghanistan in the face of a reinvigorated Taliban offensive and have left the Iraqis to fend for themselves against a growing wave of terrorist bombings by al Qaeda and its accomplices in murder and mayhem.
Despite Mr. Obama’s election-year braggadocio that he’d all but crushed al Qaeda, the lengthening list of countries where our embassies were closed shows the extent to which their forces have grown throughout the Middle East and beyond: Egypt, Yemen, Libya, Pakistan, and much if not most of North Africa, including Kenya and Tanzania.
“Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula is probably the biggest threat to the homeland. They’re the al Qaeda faction that still talks about hitting the West and hitting the [U.S.] homeland … . So we are on a high state of alert,” says Rep. Michael McCaul, Texas Republican and chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee. The threat, he adds, is “very imminent.”
In one of those telecommunications intercepts, al-Zawahri sent “clear orders” to Nasir al-Wuhayshi, the head of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and bin Laden’s former personal secretary, to conduct a major attack.
Al-Wuhayshi was recently promoted to the No. 2 post in the al Qaeda command structure. His affiliate is thought to have been responsible for the foiled plot to explode a bomb aboard a passenger jet on its way to Detroit on Christmas Day in 2009 and attempts to blow up cargo planes in 2010.
These communications intercepts have revealed the most detailed attack orders in years and demonstrate the growing confidence of al Qaeda’s high command to inflict yet another massive attack on the United States or our Western allies.
Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, has compared the intercepts to the kind of messages being heard before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. “This is the most serious threat that I’ve seen in the last several years,” he said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” Sunday.
The senator isn’t being hyperbolic about the intercepts’ threats. Terrorism experts point out that al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula is considered to be the most dangerous and most effective affiliate of the global terrorist network. That al Qaeda’s second in command is in charge of this new offensive has set off red flags at NSA’s command posts.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
By Brahma Chellaney
Get Breaking Alerts
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'economic freedom zones' for Detroit
- Redskins' season hits bottom with Chiefs blowout
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- FENNO: Mike Shanahan's empty words no salve to free-falling Redskins
- U.S. debt jumps a record $328 billion tops $17 trillion for first time
- Sen. Rand Paul: 'I am seriously thinking about' running for president in 2016
- Legalizing illegal immigrants is the solution to Obamacare: Democrat
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics