Democrats join GOP in grilling Kerry over Iran deal

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

President Obama’s nuclear deal reached last month with Iran faced bipartisan criticism Tuesday as Secretary of State John F. Kerry gave his first defense of the agreement on Capitol Hill.

Several Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee joined Republicans in expressing skepticism about the administration’s willingness to ease sanctions on Iran without requiring Tehran to cease all uranium activities while negotiations on a more permanent agreement take place.

“I want to make it clear that I have some serious reservations,” New York Rep. Eliot L. Engel, the committee’s ranking Democrat, told Mr. Kerry.

While Mr. Engel praised Mr. Kerry’s “incredible personal efforts” to engage Tehran diplomatically, he slammed the initial agreement, saying that, “at a minimum, it should have required Iran to suspend uranium enrichment, as demanded by six separate U.N. Security Council resolutions.”

“I don’t think it’s asking too much of Iran to say that at least while we’re talking, you stop enriching,” he said. “For the six-month period while we’re talking, Iran, in my estimation, should not be enriching.”

The committee’s GOP chairman, Rep. Edward R. Royce of California, joined his Democratic colleague, warning that the U.S. “may have bargained away our fundamental position.”

“That fundamental agreement is that Iran should not be enriching and reprocessing,” Mr. Royce said. “And we may bargain that away for a false confidence that we can effectively block Iran’s misuse of these key nuclear bomb-making technologies.”

Mr. Kerry told lawmakers the deal reached by the U.S., Russia, China, Germany, Britain and France with Iran last month in Geneva was only “preliminary” and that once it is implemented, the agreement effectively “halts the progress of Iran’s nuclear program” and “rolls it back in certain places for the first time in nearly 10 years.”

“The national security of the United States is stronger under this first-step agreement than it was before,” Mr. Kerry argued. “Israel’s national security is stronger … and the Gulf and Middle East interests are more secure.”

But lawmakers expressed concern that, while Iran may have agreed to curtail its nuclear program and open it to scrutiny from international observers, the initial deal reached in Geneva allows the Islamic republic to enrich uranium to a level of 5 percent.

That’s well below the level needed for bombs, but still too high for many in the Middle East.

Israeli leaders, who have long argued that Iran is secretly seeking to obtain a nuclear bomb, have condemned the deal.

Mr. Kerry and the administration are trying to head off moves on Capitol Hill to impose additional economic sanctions on Iran, warning it could undermine the agreement.

While recent days have suggested there may not be enough political momentum on Capitol Hill to pass such legislation, Mr. Kerry set out Tuesday to allay concerns over the enrichment issue.

“Under this agreement, Iran will have to neutralize, end its entire stockpile of 20 percent uranium, which you all know is a short step away from weapons-grade uranium,” he told the hearing.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

About the Author
Guy Taylor

Guy Taylor

Guy Taylor is the National Security Team Leader at The Washington Times, overseeing the paper’s State Department, Pentagon and intelligence community coverage. He’s also a frequent guest on The McLaughlin Group and C-SPAN.

His series on political, economic and security developments in Mexico won a 2012 Virginia Press Association award.

Prior to rejoining The Times in 2011, his work was ...

Latest Stories

Latest Blog Entries

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks