- Boy Scout, 12, killed by rolling tree during troop outing at Washington park
- South Korean president: Ferry crew actions ‘murderous’
- President Obama poised to grant clemency to nonviolent drug offenders: report
- Teen OK after riding in wheel well of Hawaii jet
- Kraft recalls 96K pounds of Oscar Mayer hot dogs over cheese error
- Boy Scouts boots church as host after gay leadership dispute
- Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s new book raises 2016 presidential speculation
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Rep. Marsha Blackburn: Hillary Clinton won’t be first female president
- French president accuses Syria’s Assad of gassing his own citizens
EDITORIAL: Marriage by reality TV
Looking to the ‘stars’ for answers to momentous questions
Those who warned that legalizing same-sex marriage would put us on a slippery slope toward bigamy, polygamy, polyandry and worse got it exactly right. A federal court on Friday decreed that everyone has the right to live like they do on reality television. A man can have four wives, four husbands, or four wives and four husbands or another combination if he can figure out one.
U.S. District Court Judge Clark Waddoups concluded this in siding with the polygamous Brown household of the reality-TV show “Sister Wives,” invalidating key parts of Utah’s anti-polygamy law as unconstitutional. The Brown household comprises Kody Brown and his four “wives,” Christine, Meri, Robyn and Janelle.
The Browns are members of a breakaway Mormon sect that embraces polygamy as a core belief. It’s not part of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which does not embrace polygamy.
Judge Waddoups, appointed by President George W. Bush, declared that sections of Utah’s bigamy law violates the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution. He found that the law is used to prosecute a married man who engages in “religious cohabitation,” but similar conduct is unpunished when a married man cohabits with someone other than his wife. The judge found the law gives prosecutors too much power “to decide whether and when (and against whom) to enforce the cohabitation prong of the statute.”
This is a sensitive issue for Utah; the state was required to include a ban on polygamy in its state constitution as a condition of admission to the union in 1896. Judge Waddoups‘ 91-page ruling does not actually legalize polygamy, but it applies more grease to a very slippery slope.
The decision drew on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling in Lawrence v. Texas, striking down a Texas law banning sodomy. As Rick Santorum, then a U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, warned at the time, “If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [homosexual] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything.” Lawyers for the Browns cited Lawrence v. Texas in arguing that Utah’s law violates their right to privacy, a curious argument for five people who live out their lives in the “privacy” of reality TV.
The real question is whether this is where Americans want to go as a society. If the traditional definition of marriage, as between one man and one woman, serving as the nurturing foundation of a family for raising children, fails, marriage becomes an arbitrary and meaningless concept.
Fundamental public policy decisions such as defining of marriage must be made by the people, who still generally support traditional marriage, and not by unelected judges, who may be writing protections for their own sexual proclivities. We should not look to reality-TV celebrities for answers to such momentous questions.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- EDITORIAL: Republicans finally fight back vs. phony 'war on women'
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Recent Brandeis choices disgraceful
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: A Carson 'apology' to Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- CURL: Shelly O first lady Michelle Obama comes in last
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Twitter blocks accounts critical of Turkish government
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Building a D.C. memorial for an endless war bumps into regulations