- The Washington Times - Thursday, December 19, 2013


Inquiring minds want to know: who do the nation’s esteemed lawmakers work for? It looks like the freewheeling group works for nobody. The vast majority of Americans — 90 percent — say elected officials in Washington behave “like they don’t have a boss.” So says a Fox New poll released Thursday. Only 7 percent overall say the lawmakers behave as if they were “employees of the American public.”

And alas. Woe is Washington as well. Another 71 percent say the federal government “is broken,” while 21 percent say the government is “just OK.” A determined 6 percent say things work “pretty well.” These are all record-breaking numbers, by the way.

“In addition, the new poll shows that the belief that Washington is broken is growing. It’s up six percentage points since last year and up 13 points since 2010,” observes Fox News analyst Dana Blanton.


All politics may be local. But politics also tends to be allegorical, particularly when money is involved. Take that pesky budget deal that meandered and sidestepped and then bolted through both House and Senate, with some embellishment by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid along the way. It is now a symbol of bigger things, says one cryptic observer.

“This budget bill exemplifies what is wrong with Washington. Nothing is getting fixed. No important reforms are being addressed. The people get little in return except more debt, more taxes, and no change to the Obamacare disaster,” says Sen. Ted Cruz.

“The Senate majority voted to allow Sen. Reid to ignore all Republican amendments. Over and over, this is the roughshod style of leadership that characterizes this Senate and underscores why Washington badly needs to listen to the people,” the Texas Republican concludes.


They watch, and sometimes marvel, over the historically low, bottom-scraping, lingering-at-6-percent approval ratings for the Congress, findings reported by major pollsters for months.

“Democrats and Republicans don’t even seem to care that their approval ratings are in the gutter,” notes Carla Howell, political director for the increasingly aggressive Libertarian Party, which will stage a national convention in San Diego next month.

“So long as they can pass laws to marginalize other political parties and get themselves re-elected, they’re satisfied,” she says, adding, “Democrats and Republicans want to avoid dealing with heated budget negotiations next fall when many are up for re-election. So they’re trying to pass a two-year rather than a one-year budget — purely self-serving, fiscally irresponsible in the extreme, and heartless.”


The news media has much to crow about as far as “Duck Dynasty” is concerned. The suspension of Phil Robertson — patriarch and star of the uber-popular Arts and Entertainment Network reality TV series — offered ample opportunities for puns, questions, speculations, constitutional discussion and sheer bombast. Among the headlines:

“Is the ‘Duck Dynasty’ goose cooked?” (Fox News), “The real Duck Dynasty scandal is about race” (The Atlantic), “The ‘Duck Dynasty’ fiasco says more about our bigotry than Phil’s” (Time Magazine), “‘Duck Dynasty’ ignites culture war” (Entertainment weekly), “A & E fowls up ‘Duck’ flap” (USA Today), “Will Duck Dynasty suffer the same fate as Paula Deen?” (CBS News), “Conservatives leap to Phil Robertson’s defense” (Hollywood Reporter), “What to do when your golden ‘Duck’ lays an egg” (Washington Post).

Story Continues →